Case Report


Challenges in Distinguishing Neuro-Behcets Disease from Other Neurological Conditions. A case report from Pakistan

Authors: Rafi ullah, Arusa Lakhani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37184/jlnh.2959-1805.2.29
Year: 2025
Volume: 3
Received: Apr 17, 2024
Revised: Aug 27, 2024
Accepted: Sep 04, 2024
Corresponding Auhtor: Rafi ullah (rafii7062@gmail.com)
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License


Challenges in Distinguishing Neuro-Behcet’s Disease from Other Neurological Conditions: A Case Report from Pakistan

Abstract

Neuro-Behcet’s Disease (NBD) is a rare complication of Behcet’s Disease, being reported in approximately 5% of cases. This case study details a 36-year-old man with Behcet’s Disease who has developed acute neurological symptoms, including right arm weakness, vision disturbance, facial numbness, and intermittent gait disturbance. The patient had a history of recurrent oral ulcers, genital ulcers and episodes of uveitis. Diagnostic imaging revealed characteristic findings such as perilesional vasogenic edema and nodular enhancement. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed elevated protein levels and neutrophils, consistent with NBD. However, the scarcity of screening and specific diagnostic tests makes it difficult to diagnose NBD in the early stage. Hence, it is realized that the complexities in NBD demand a multidisciplinary approach where advanced practice nurses, rheumatologists, neurologists, and infectious disease experts can work together to achieve early diagnosis and effective management for optimizing prognosis and enhancing the quality of life. This case also underscores the need for ongoing multispecialty care in the long-term management of NBD.

Keywords: Neuro-Behcet’s disease, Behcet’s disease, diagnostic challenges, multi-disciplinary approach, differential diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION

Neuro-Behcet’s disease (NBD) is a rare neurological complication of Behcet’s disease (BD), which is an autoimmune vasculitis disorder affecting blood vessels [1]. It is characterized by neurological symptoms and signs in an individual diagnosed with BD [2]. In NBD, approximately 50% of cases involve the brainstem, while diencephalon and other brain regions are affected in around 30%. Additionally, the spinal cord is impacted in roughly 10% of cases. These neurological complications can lead to movement disorders, epilepsy, psychiatric symptoms, and cognitive issues, which can result from both the brain disease itself, inflammation, and feelings of fatigue and despondency [3]. Behcet’s disease typically impacts individuals aged 20 to 40 [4]. The condition affects both genders, with male predominance in Arab populations and female predominance in Korea, China, the US, and northern Europe, and has a more severe course in males and younger populations [5].

CASE PRESENTATION

The case begins with a 36-year-old male patient presenting with a sudden onset of neurological symptoms. Two days before admission, he was in his usual state of health when he experienced the abrupt onset of right arm weakness and facial numbness. These symptoms were intermittent and were accompanied by gait disturbance and fever. Additionally, he reported

red spots in his eyes. On neurological examination, the patient had spontaneous eye-opening; pupils were

bilateral, equal, and reacted to light, and measured 2 mm; tone and bulk examined normal in all four limbs; power was 2/5 in the right upper and lower limbs and 3/5 in the left upper and lower limbs; the plantar was bilaterally mute.

The patient had a history of recurrent oral ulcers, genital ulcers, and skin lesions that raised suspicion of Behcet’s disease. These mucocutaneous symptoms are key features of Behcet’s disease, and their presence, along with the patient’s history of uveitis, further supported the diagnosis of Behcet’s disease.

These recent symptoms prompted a medical evaluation to assess the potential neurological and ocular manifestations associated with Behcet’s disease. CT head, MRI and lumber puncture were done. CT head without contrast revealed perilesional vasogenic edema, and MRI showed abnormal foci, diffused restriction, and nodular enhancement on the left frontoparietal lobe and basal ganglia. In contrast, the CSF showed a raised protein level. The diagnosis of Neuro-Behcet’s Disease was established by a history of mucocutaneous symptoms and corroborated by characteristic neurological findings on neuroimaging. CSF analysis confirmed this diagnosis, showing that elevated protein and neutrophilic pleocytosis findings were consistent with NBD. Differential diagnoses like multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus were taken, but later they were ruled out based on the clinical presentation and laboratory results. The patient was finally diagnosed

with Neuro-Behcet’s disease and managed according to

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37184/jlnh.2959-1805.2.29

the recommendations of rheumatology and the ID team.

Upon admission of the patient to the ward, steroid pulse therapy was started. By the fourth day of his

admission, the patient’s symptoms worsened, and the patient became aggressive and abusive. This change in mental status prompted an evaluation by the psychiatric team; the Psychiatric team labelled it delirium and started Haloperidol. Other Medications include methylprednisolone pulse, cyclophosphamide, and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Despite these interventions, the patient continued to have multiple seizure episodes, which necessitated further evaluation and a change in the treatment plan.

Regardless of such interventions, the patient still had multiple seizure episodes. An electroencephalogram (ECG) was performed, which showed normal findings. On the ninth day of admission, the patient’s condition further declined, and GCS dropped to 7/15 with recurrent seizures, mandating intubation to secure the airway and shifting to an intensive care unit.

After being in the ICU for eight days, the patient’s condition showed signs of improvement and stabilization of vital signs; extubation was performed as the patient demonstrated improved neurological function and could maintain adequate ventilation independently. The patient was then transferred back to the ward, and discharge planning was initiated. Upon discharge, the patient’s neurological status and vital signs were within acceptable ranges, the discharge plan included plans for ongoing patient monitoring and recovery support through nursing home care (Figs. 1 and 2).

The laboratory results strongly suggest Neuro-Behcet’s Disease. The elevated level of CRP at 35.90 mg/L demonstrates active systemic inflammation. A significant LA ratio of 1.5 also supports an increased thrombosis susceptibility, a common complication of Behcet’s Disease. Moreover, the raised white blood cell count and a high percentage of neutrophils in the CSF indicate substantial inflammation in the central nervous system. The elevated value of the CSF protein a, 150 mg/dl, is related to blood-brain barrier disturbance, representing a characteristic

feature of neurodegenerative brain disorders that reflect the severity of the neuroinflammatory process. The low serum potassium value of 3.2 mEq/L and the low lymphocyte percentage of 17.1% may relate to chronic inflammation or the consequences of immunosuppressive therapy. Such results consequently hold a strong inflammatory response involving the systemic and central nervous systems, thereby requiring urgent and aggressive intervention to minimize further neurologic insult and sequelae (Table 1).

DISCUSSION

NBD is one of the most serious and challenging manifestations of Behcet’s disease, both to correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment. The absence of specific diagnostic tests for NBD makes it difficult to distinguish from other neurological disorders, necessitating careful evaluation and differentiation by clinicians. The diverse and non-specific symptoms of NBD, such as recurrent oral and genital ulcers, meningoencephalitis, and peripheral neuropathy,

Table 1: Laboratory investigation.

Lab Test

Unit

Reference Range

Result

Serum Mg

mg/dl

1.6-2.6 mg/dL

1.6

Serum Na

mEq/L

136-145

mEq/L

137

Serum K

mEq/L

3.5-5.1 mEq/L

3.2 ↓

Serum Chloride

mEq/L

98-107 mEq/L

99

Hb

g/dl

12.3-16.6 g/dl

13.1

HCT

%

38.4-50.7%

39.5

RBC

million/µL

4.25-6.02

million/µL

4.46

WBC

thousand/µL

4.8-11.3

thousand/µL

10.6

Lymphocytes

%

17.5-45%

17.1 ↓

Platelets

thousand/µL

154-433

thousand/µL

221

Creatinine

mg/dl

0.9-1.3 mg/dl

1.0

LA Screen

sec

31-44 sec

56.4 ↑

LA

Confirmatory

sec

30-38 sec

39.0 ↑

LA Ratio

-

0.8-1.1

1.5 ↑

CRP

mg/L

0-10 mg/L

35.90 ↑

CSF protein

Mg/dl

15-45 mg/dL

150 ↑

CSF Chloride

mEq/L

122-132

mEq/L

119 ↓

CSF WBC

×10³/µL

0-0.005 ×10³/

µL

0.041 ↑

CSF

Neutrophils

%

0-24%

60% ↑

complicate the diagnostic process further, as these symptoms often overlap with other conditions like multiple sclerosis, stroke, or even infections [2].

The complexity of diagnosing NBD lies in its heterogeneous presentation and the lack of specific biomarkers. Practitioners must rely heavily on clinical insight, detailed patient history, and the exclusion of alternative causes. Collaborative efforts involving specialists such as rheumatologists and neurologists are crucial in navigating the diagnostic landscape of Behcet’s disease [2]. The ongoing research into potential biomarkers and advanced diagnostic tools, including MRI with contrast, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and genetic markers, is vital for improving the precision and efficiency of NBD diagnosis [6].

The case presented underscores the diagnostic complexity of NBD. The symptoms presented by the patient, including right arm weakness, facial numbness, and fever, might also be characteristic of different neurological conditions, thereby complicating the differential diagnosis. Imaging findings, such as perilesional vasogenic edema and abnormal foci on MRI, although suggestive of NBD, are not definitive and require careful interpretation alongside clinical features [7].

Systemic Treatment and Therapeutic Challenges were also present, as systemic anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating medications are the cornerstone of NBD treatment. The primary treatment involves glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants, with agents like low-dose methotrexate (MTX) and infliximab showing efficacy in halting the progression of neuropsychological symptoms. However, the response to these treatments can be unpredictable, as evidenced by the patient’s worsening symptoms despite initial steroid therapy, which necessitated psychiatric intervention and intensive care management [6].

While effective in some cases, corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, and azathioprine are not universally successful, further complicating the treatment landscape [6].

The steady improvement of the patient over time from a critically deteriorated condition illustrates the variable nature of NBD, highlighting the uncertainty in prognosis and the challenges in long-term management. This variability also complicates prognosis and necessitates ongoing multispecialty care. The chronic nature of the disease requires not only acute management but also long-term follow-up and support for potential relapses and persistent neurological deficits. A major challenge

Rafi ullah and Arusa Lakhani

in the long-term management of NBD is the lack of reliable diagnostic markers or techniques to accurately assess its severity in Behcet’s disease [7].

The development of neuropsychiatric symptoms, including delirium, adds another layer of complexity to the management of NBD. These symptoms represent either the disease itself or the side effects of treatment, again pointing out that a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach is required for psychiatric care to be incorporated into traditional neurological and rheumatological intervention [8].

The complexity of NBD calls for an organized approach to its coordinated management. Rheumatologists, neurologists, psychiatrists, and other specialists must come together to deal with the variations in symptoms and complications that might develop. Hence, future research should aim to define specific diagnostic markers and lead to the formulation of standardized treatment protocols so that NBD can be treated with greater precision and effectiveness. Advanced neuroimaging, genetic markers, and large autoimmune panels will provide a more exact diagnostic process and lead to more effective management strategies [3, 6].

CONCLUSION

Neuro-Behcet’s disease”is a rare and severe manifestation of Behcet’s disease, marked by challenging neurological symptoms. The absence of specific diagnostic tests and the variable clinical presentation make NBD difficult to identify, often leading to a delayed diagnosis. A crucial aspect lies in the necessity for a multidisciplinary approach involving specialists from rheumatology, neurology, infectious diseases, and advanced practice nurses. This collaborative effort is vital for early detection, prompt intervention, and effective management of complications, emphasizing the intricate nature of NBD.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Approval for the publication of medical information and clinical photographs was obtained from the patient attendant.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

I affirm that the authors have no financial or personal connections with individuals that might introduce bias into the research presented in this publication. They also have no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I want to acknowledge, with special thanks, for the invaluable help of Dr. Faheem Sheikh, my clinical preceptor, who helped me throughout the clinical evaluation of the case. I also extend my gratitude to

Ms. Faryal Ghafoor for her assistance in reviewing the patient files and helping with data gathering. Additionally, I appreciate the resources provided by the Aga Khan School of Nursing and the Aga Khan Hospital, which were essential for this study.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

Rafiullah is the main author of this case report and is responsible for identifying the case, gathering relevant clinical data, and drafting the manuscript.

Arusa Lakhani oversaw the planning and execution of the case report. Her contributions included directing its overall direction, offering mentorship, and critically reviewing the manuscript.

Both authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and accept responsibility for its integrity and accuracy.

REFERENCES

1. Peine B, Figueroa C, Robinette Neuro-Behcet’s syndrome: Case report and literature review. Radiol Case Rep 2022; 17(9): 3064-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2022.05.070 PMID: 35769120

2. Borhani-Haghighi A, Kardeh B, Banerjee S, Yadollahikhales G, Safari A, Sahraian MA, et al. Neuro-Behcet’s disease: An update on diagnosis, differential diagnoses, and Mult Scler Relat Disord 2020; 39: 101906.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2019.101906 PMID: 31887565

3. Kidd DP. Neurological involvement by Behçet’s syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and outcome. Pract Neurol 2023; 23(5): 386-400.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/pn-2023-003875 PMID: 37775123

4. Karincaoglu Y, Borlu M, Toker SC, Akman A, Onder M, Gunasti S, et al. Demographic and clinical properties of juvenile-onset Behçet’s disease: A controlled multicenter study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58(4): 579-84.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2007.10.452 PMID: 18045733

5. Yazici H, Tüzün Y, Pazarli H, Yurdakul S, Ozyazgan Y, Ozdoğan H, et al. Influence of age of onset and patient’s sex on the prevalence and severity of manifestations of Behçet’s syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 1984; 43(6): 783-9.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.43.6.783 PMID: 6524980

6. Noel N, Bernard R, Wechsler B, Resche-Rigon M, Depaz R, Le Thi Huong Boutin D, et al. Long-term outcome of neuro- Behçet’s disease. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014; 66(5): 1306-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.38351 PMID: 24782188

7. Yin H, Song Y, Zheng M, Han J, Tang Behcet’s disease with cerebral artery infarction caused by cerebral arteritis as an early symptom only with elevated interleukin-8. Front Neurol 2019; 10: 1102.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01102 PMID: 31695669

8. Kalra S, Silman A, Akman-Demir G, Bohlega S, Borhani- Haghighi A, Constantinescu CS, et al. Diagnosis and management of Neuro-Behçet’s disease: international consensus J Neurol 2014; 261(9): 1662-76.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-7209-3 PMID: 24366648