Original Article


Hypertension Research Productivity from Saudi Arabia: A Scientometric Analysis for the Last Two Decades (2001-2020)

Authors: Fahad Anwer , Ahmad Azam Malik
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37184/lnjpc.2707-3521.5.33
Year: 2023
Volume: 5
Corresponding Auhtor: Ahmad Azam Malik (ahmedazammalik@hotmail.com)
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License



Abstract

Background:
Hypertension (HTN) is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases and important global morbidity and mortality, along with other prevalent cardiovascular risk factors. Nonetheless, there has been little data on publication trends and performance evaluation from the Middle East region, including from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

Objective:
This study analysed KSA’s hypertension-related research output over the last two decades (2001-2020).

Methods:
The Web of Science (WoS) platform was used to extract HTN-related data, and then scientometric analysis was done utilizing the “R-Bibliometrix’ package. An extensive array of indicators was studied to determine the quality and quantity of HTN- related publications from KSA.

Results:
A total of 3129 research publications from 1274 sources were extracted using WoS over 20 years (2001-2020). Most of the documents (2617) were articles. After 2012, there was a substantial increase in research articles, which peaked in 2020. Among 21343 total authors from 131 countries, two authors had > 40 publications and five had > 2500 total citations. King Saud University (KSU) was the major contributing affiliation, followed by King Abdulaziz University (KAU). Saudi Medical Journal (SMJ) was the leading and most consistent source, while Hypertension, blood pressure, and Saudi Arabia were the most frequently used keywords.

Conclusion:
Our study provides an in-depth overview of hypertension-related research productivity from KSA. Some characteristic trends were observed regarding contributions by top authors, productivity, impact, international collaborations, and organizational affiliations. Related stakeholders can find the study findings very useful in precisely interpreting trends and performance of hypertension-related regional work.

Keywords:
Hypertension, research, Saudi Arabia, bibliometry, web of science.

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension (HTN) is a chronic illness that has become extremely prevalent, reaching a pandemic phase and resulting in substantial health costs, morbidity, and mortality. It is one of the leading causes of cerebrovascular accidents, aneurysms, cardiac failure, coronary artery disease, kidney dysfunction, and peripheral arterial disease. It is a silent killer since it can gradually damage target organs without producing symptoms.

According to WHO, around 1.28 billion adults aged 30- 79 have HTN worldwide. An estimated 46% of these individuals are unaware that they have HTN and less than half of the hypertensive adults are diagnosed and treated. From 1990 to 2019, there was minimal change in the global rate of HTN, but the burden has transferred from wealthy nations to low- and middle-income countries. In 2019, more than one billion hypertensive people (82% of all hypertensive people worldwide) lived in low- and middle-income countries [1]. In 2018, however, the American College of Cardiology estimated the prevalence of HTN to range from 4 to 78% in 71 countries worldwide [2].

Increased prevalence of HTN always leads to a significant increase in the incidence of cardiovascular diseases and their repercussions, potentially overwhelming healthcare systems [3]. It also has financial implications for national drug plans because there is growing evidence that most hypertensive patients require two or more medications to manage blood pressure [4].

Attempts have been made to analyse HTN trends in Arab countries in recent years. A critical appraisal of HTN-related literature from ten Arab countries reported the overall crude prevalence of HTN (BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg and/or use of antihypertensive medication) was 29.5% in 11 studies (n = 45,379) [5]. However, another study conducted in four Middle Eastern countries (Iran, Occupied Palestinian Territory, KSA, and the United Arab Emirates) in 2016-17 found a collective prevalence of HTN at 33%, a 3.5% increase in three years [6].

The prevalence of HTN is increasing in KSA’s neighbouring countries. HTN was reported to be 38.2% prevalent in rural parts of Egypt [7]. Whereas, in Jordan, 33.8% of men and 29.4% of women were hypertensive [8]. In KSA, overall mortality from HTN increased from 1.88% in 1990 to 2.37% in 2005 and 2010. It is also a leading contributor to disability-adjusted life years, rising from 5.91% in 1990 to 7.83% in 2010 [9].

According to a 2010 national survey, the prevalence of HTN was 25.5%, with only 44.7% of hypertensives being aware, 71.8% receiving medications, and 37% being controlled [10]. However, a similar survey conducted in 2014 showed a different picture, with 15.2% of the Saudis being hypertensive, while around 40.6% had borderline HTN and 57.8% of the cases were undiagnosed. Most participants with HTN (78.9%) reported taking medication to treat their condition, and about 45% of participants on HTN medication had their blood pressure controlled [11]. Since then, no significant research on HTN was conducted until 2016, when the African Middle East Cardiovascular Epidemiological (ACE) study investigated the prevalence of various cardiovascular risk factors and found that HTN was present in 47.5% of Saudi adult patients attending various clinics [12]. The Ministry of Health released HTN prevalence statistics in 2018. According to their findings, HTN affects 3.2% of those aged 15-24, 51.2% of those aged 55-64, and up to 70% of those aged 65 years and older [13].

A scientometric analysis is a newly emerging division of information theory that quantitatively analyses previously recorded research properties and behaviour. This has led to research based on quantitative measurements and unbiased data analysis. This innovative analysis technique provides objective data on scientific output in a disciplinary field, a medical specialty, or a disease area. Indicators are used in scientometrics to compare countries, institutions, and disciplines, allowing for the determination of temporal trends. It can play a significant role in providing meaningful data to assist nations in improving their research policies. There has been a rapid expansion in research productivity in this domain over the last two decades.

Many scientometric studies on medicine have been published recently, but very few on HTN. Only three studies analyzed data from HTN-related publications in the global context. One study examined the top 100 most frequently cited articles essentially focused on HTN from all countries over a period covering the whole 20 th century (1900-2013) [14]. Devos and Menard conducted a descriptive scientometric study of HTN research output published worldwide over 20 years (1999-2018) [15]. This study was a step up from the previous work, which analysed HTN-related output globally but focused more on the research productivity from European Union countries and compared it with other developed counties like the United States (US), albeit with some limitations [16].

To our knowledge, no Asian researcher has undertaken a similar bibliometric analysis on HTN. Moreover, there is no detailed analysis available for HTN-related research in KSA. The present study investigated the various dimensions of HTN publications published in KSA over the last 20 years (2001-2020) and analysed its multiple trends in-depth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The World Bank estimates the population of KSA to be around 32.94 million and categorizes it into a group of high-income countries. The Kingdom has a gross domestic product (GDP) of $683.8 billion and gross national income (GNI) per capita of $20,080 [17]. The country has made considerable investments in research and development, resulting in increased publications in the last few years. Numerous databases are available for researchers and academicians, including Scopus, EBSCO, Science Direct, ProQuest, and PubMed. WoS, the most relevant and widely used database, was chosen, along with appropriate criteria, search topics, and identified keywords from the literature, to retrieve relevant documents. WoS is a Clarivate Analytics (formerly Thomson Reuters) maintained platform. It is considered the most precise and comprehensive scientific exploration source, with the highest quality indexing. It is also assumed to be more appropriate for evaluating the research output of different regions, authors, or organizations [18]. It encompasses a search across major search databases, disciplines, and document types and over one billion searchable cited references [19].

A variety of indicators have been used in the study to measure the quantity and quality of the publications and provide a critical picture of KSA’s national and international contributions to HTN literature. The online library and digital resources of KAU were used to access information. This study used scientometric techniques to ensure data quality during the initial extraction and later processing phases. The study examined all published articles in WoS between 2000 and 2020 that specifically addressed HTN.

The following search strategy was used: TS=(Hypertens* OR Blood pressure OR HTN), refined by CU=SAUDI ARABIA, timespan (2000–2020), Indexes (SCI Expanded, SSCI, A&HCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH, ESCI). The use of “hypertens*” in the above strategy implies that all relevant derivatives of the HTN research term, such as hypertension and hypertensive, are also assessed, and the records retrieved. In total, 3129 documents were found from 1293 sources. The search was conducted on a single day (November 25 th , 2021), to avoid inconsistencies with no language restrictions and all types of publications (total = 3129) included.

Data was extracted from WoS in plain text files, and later bibliometric analysis was performed using the “R-Bibliometrix” package at the author, source, and document levels [20]. The information from the retrieved documents was analysed using various bibliometric metrics, such as journals, publication year, authors, citation reports, institutions, and countries/regions.

RESULTS

A total of 3129 research publications were extracted from 1274 sources over the last 20 years (2001-2020), with 2707 (86.5%) published in the last decade. The average number of documents per year for the study period was 156.45. The total number of citations from all documents was 49413. The average number of citations per document was 15.79, but it nearly doubled (30.32) in the first decade. The total references used were 99595, of which 89623 were used between 2011 and 2020. The total research participating authors were 21343 from 131 countries, with a total of 33515 author appearances. The number of authors of single-authored documents was 210, while the number of authors of multi-authored documents was 2113. On average, there were 6.82 authors and 10.7 co-authors per document. Most of the documents, 2617 (83.6%), were articles, followed by 314 reviews, 156 other categories, 23 editorials, and 19 letters/correspondences (Table 1).

Table 1:
Summary table.

Description

2001-

2010

2011-

2020

2001-

2020

Sources (Journals, Books, etc. ).

208

1170

1274

Documents, count

422

2707

3129

Average years from publication

14.5

4.05

5.46

Average citations per document

30.32

13.53

15.79

Average citations per year per doc

2.019

2.35

2.305

References, count

11775

89623

99595

Document Contents

Keywords Plus (ID), count

1509

6143

6839

Author’s Keywords (DE), count

841

5744

6220

Authors, count

4657

17085

21343

Author Appearances, count

5148

28367

33515

Authors of single-authored documents, count

56

161

210

Authors of multi-authored documents, count

4601

16924

21133

Authors Collaboration

Single-authored documents, count

68

180

248

Documents per author, average

0.0906

0.158

0.147

Authors per document, average

11

6.31

6.82

Co-Authors per Documents, average

12.2

10.5

10.7

Collaboration Index

13

6.7

7.34

Document Types

Articles, count

355

2262

2617

Editorials, count

5

18

23

Letters/Correspondences, count

3

16

19

Reviews, count

33

281

314

Others, count

26

130

156

The year-wise distribution of hypertension-related research documents showed the lowest number (18) in 2001 and the highest number (509) in 2020. The number of documents produced remained in the double digits until 2012, after which there was a sharp increase in the number of research articles published annually, reaching a peak in 2020. However, the mean total citations (TC) per year showed an undefined pattern, with the highest score in the year 2006 (69.1) and the lowest mean TCs in the previous three years (Fig. 1).

Fig. (1):
Year-wise distribution of documents and mean total citations

Analysis of the top ten most prominent affiliations and funding sources for research projects on HTN showed KSU and KAU contributed the most research documents from KSA, with 1191 and 552, respectively. The foreign affiliations that stood out the most were Helsinki University, Cairo University, and Washington University. The leading funding source was KSU’s Deanship of Scientific Research while the National Institute of Health (NIH), USA, and the US Department of Human Health Services were prominent among foreign funding organizations (Table 2).

Table 2:
Top 10 most frequent affiliations and funding sources.

Affiliations

Count

Funding Organizations

Count

King Saud Univ

1191

King Saud University

145

King Abdulaziz Univ

552

National Institutes of

Health NIH USA

117

King Faisal Specialist Hosp And Res Ctr

292

United States Department

of Health Human Services

117

King Saud Bin Abdulaziz

Univ Hlth Sci

207

European Commission

71

Univ Helsinki

123

UK Research Innovation UKRI

55

Cairo Univ

118

NIH National Heart Lung Blood Institute NHLBI

49

Univ Washington

110

Medical Research Council

UK MRC

46

King Khalid Univ

107

British Heart Foundation

45

Imperial Coll London

100

NIH National Institute of Diabetes Digestive Kidney Diseases NIDDK

33

Univ Oxford

100

Canadian Institutes of Health Research CIHR

32

The top 20 most productive countries, authors, and organizations inferred from the three-field analysis indicated that KSA, Qatar, USA, and Oman were the main contributors, while KSU, KAU, and Zagazig University were the chief organizational contributors. The authors, Al-Daghri NM (KSU) and Alokali (KSU), El bassossy HM (KAU), and Tuomilehto J (KAU) demonstrated a maximum collaborative curve for these countries and organizations (Fig. 2).

Fig. (2):
Three Field Plot for the top 20 most productive countries, authors and organizations.

The yearly progress of the ten most productive sources revealed that “SMJ” was a relatively consistent contributor over the last 20 years. “Saudi Journal of Kidney Disease and Transplantations” showed relative growth trends in the last 3-4 years. “Cureus,” “Medical Science” and “Indo-Pak Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences” experienced sudden exponential growth in the last few years. In contrast, two sources, “ASM” and “Annals of Thoracic Medicine,” showed a decreasing trend in recent years (Fig. 3).

Fig. (3):
Year-wise growth of the 10 most productive sources

Analysis of the co-occurrence network based on the 30 most frequently used keywords demonstrated that among the four highlighted networks, the most commonly used keyword in the most prominent network was ‘HTN’ and ‘blood pressure’, forming a mesh with search words mainly related to other co-morbid health conditions and cardiovascular risk factors like diabetes mellitus, obesity, dyslipidaemia, and smoking. The second largest network was formed by the keyword ‘Saudi Arabia’ in conjunction with other keywords mostly related to epidemiological or observational research studies such as risk factors, prevalence, awareness, and so on. Search for COVID-19 can also be seen in the same mesh. (Fig. 4).

Fig. (4):
Most frequent keywords’ network groups

The top 20 most cited publications are shown in Table 3. With regards to local citations, 4 publications achieved more than 50 citations all to the credit of Al-Nozha MM (2004, 2007, 2005x2) all published in Saudi Med Journal. His 2004 article achieved the maximum local citations (96). Analysing for global citations as shown in WoS, 5 publications got >100 citations, with the highest rank achieved by Al-Nozha MM (2005, SAUDI MED J-a). The same achieved the highest overall citation score of 268. According to IC/GC ratio figures, the highest score was seen for Al Qahtani DA, 2005, (Saudi Med J-a) with 108.33 while the lowest score was achieved by Al Qurashi KA, 2011, (Ann Saudi Med) with only 14.14. 12 (60%) of these articles were published in the last decade (2011-2020).

Document

Year

Local Citations (count)

Global Citations (count)

LC/GC

Ratio (%)

Normalized Local Citations

Normalized Global Citations

AL-NOZHA MM, 2004, SAUDI MED J

2004

96

112

85.71

25.34

5.11

AL-NOZHA MM, 2007, SAUDI MED J

2007

79

147

53.74

25.28

5.79

AL-NOZHA MM, 2005, SAUDI MED J

2005

62

93

66.67

9.86

2.86

AL-NOZHA MM, 2005, SAUDI MED J-a

2005

62

206

30.1

9.86

6.33

AL-DAGHRI NM, 2011, BMC MED

2011

34

149

22.82

28.33

4.65

ALQURASHI KA, 2011, ANN SAUDI MED

2011

28

198

14.14

23.33

6.18

EL-BASSOSSY HM, 2012, VASC PHARMACOL

2012

21

58

36.21

31.78

3.6

EL BCHERAOUI C, 2014, INT J PUBLIC HEALTH

2014

17

47

36.17

13.42

2.85

EL-BASSOSSY HM, 2013, BRIT J PHARMACOL

2013

15

46

32.61

14.08

1.18

HASSAN N, 2013, N-S ARCH PHARMACOL

2013

15

32

46.88

14.08

0.82

MEMISH ZA, 2014, PREV CHRONIC DIS-a

2014

15

52

28.85

11.84

3.15

AHMED AM, 2017, J SAUDI HEART ASSOC

2017

14

40

35

35.4

1.86

AL-QAHTANI DA, 2005, SAUDI MED J

2005

13

35

37.14

2.07

1.08

AL-QAHTANI DA, 2005, SAUDI MED J-a

2005

13

12

108.33

2.07

0.37

AL-DAGHRI NM, 2010, PLOS ONE

2010

13

34

38.24

12.39

0.91

HASSAN NA, 2014, CHEM-BIOL INTERACT

2014

13

33

39.39

10.26

2

EL-BASSOSSY HM, 2014, TOXICOL MECH METHOD

2014

12

24

50

9.47

1.45

MEMISH ZA, 2014, PREV CHRONIC DIS

2014

12

45

26.67

9.47

2.73

AL-RUBEAAN K, 2015, J DIABETES

2015

12

57

21.05

22.54

2.64

ALHABIB KF, 2009, CAN J CARDIOL

2009

11

37

29.73

14.18

1.09

Table 3:
Top 20 highly cited documents.

DISCUSSION

Hypertension is a prevalent chronic disease in KSA; hence more attention is expected to be placed in the research domains on various aspects of the disease and its management in this region. According to the current study, the total number of publications output from KSA in the last 20 years was 3129, with research articles accounting for most of them. However, this number of published articles is much lower when compared to other countries, including the US, Japan, China, the UK, and many European countries [15]. An in-depth analysis of HTN research publications revealed some intriguing trends. First, the quantity of research output related to HTN has soared exponentially over the last decade; between 2010 and 2018, the number of publications steadily increased, but between 2018-2020, they astonishingly doubled. In the last 20 years, the same trend was observed in HTN publications contributed by Asian countries, particularly China [15, 16]. A variety of factors could stimulate this trend. Firstly, in recent years, chronic diseases have captured the interest of the medical research fraternity due to their rising prevalence and heavy toll on morbidity and mortality. Secondly, cardiac risk factors have received much attention as preventive cardiology is gaining more importance. Lastly, many new drugs have recently been developed to treat HTN and numerous clinical trials have been conducted to determine their efficacy and adverse effects.

Among the most frequently affiliated academic institutes, KSU was on the top by a huge margin with 1191 affiliations, almost double the number of affiliations held by KAU, which ranked second. Overall, five Saudi Universities were among the top 10 affiliated institutes. Other universities with many affiliations were the University of Helsinki, Cairo University, Washington University, Imperial College London, and Oxford University. According to the latest statistics, the last three are among the top 30 universities in the world [21]. Organizations and institutes from the US and UK significantly contributed to funding HTN research in KSA. This clearly showed that other than KSU, there was no major local funding body for supporting HTN research and there is a need for other Saudi institutes to increase their funding contributions for HTN research in KSA.

KSA was found to be the most significant contributor to HTN research, trailed by Qatar, the USA, Oman, and Egypt. Most of the authors were from KSA and had affiliations with KSU. Only two Saudi universities, KSU and KAU, were prominently contributing to the country’s HTN research. Other local universities’ faculties, such as King Khalid and King Saud bin Abdulaziz Universities, need to enhance their research on the important aspects of HTN.

Despite a drop in publications between 2011 and 2014, SMJ was far ahead of all other journals in publishing HTN research as it consistently churned out articles over the last 20 years. Cureus, Medical Science, and IndoAmerican Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences showed a very sharp rise in publications in the last 5 to 6 years, most likely due to many experimental trials and RCTs on newly discovered medicines for the treatment of HTN. Another interesting aspect of these three journals is that they had no HTN publications before 2015.

The major networks of keywords also showed that the epicenters of major webs were HTN and KSA, and their interconnections were mostly with search words indicating cardiovascular risk factors and other comorbid diseases. This indicated that the researchers were not analysing HTN in isolation but from a broader perspective that included diabetes, obesity, and dyslipidemia. They were particularly interested in how it related to cardiovascular disease. The other major keywords were mainly related to the prevalence and awareness of hypertension in Saudi Arabia and the known complications of hypertension including myocardial infarction heart failure and mortality Very recently, researchers have been interested in how COVID-19 is affecting HTN in KSA.

CONCLUSION

In summary, a few substantial conclusions have been drawn from the present scientometric analysis of HTN in KSA, with possible implications for future related research trends. In the previous 2 to 3 years, there has been a large increase in HTN-related publications in KSA due to various expected causes. KSU has the most overall affiliations among authors, followed by KAU, indicating that other Saudi universities have a lot of gaps to fill in the country’s HTN research. Saudi Journals other than SMJ have a lot of room to contribute to HTN research in the future. In the last five years, some international journals have made a tremendous contribution to HTN research in KSA, indicating renewed interest in managing this important chronic disease.

There is a need for substantial research work in KSA and other countries in the Middle East region because there is not enough data to determine the sufficiency of HTN research. This is evident when comparing the overall research output related to HTN in KSA to the international landscape. More research will facilitate the study of all critical clinical aspects of this significant chronic disease and develop better management strategies for HTN in the regional context.

ETHICS APPROVAL

Not applicable.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA

The data set may be acquired from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request.

FUNDING

No funding was used to conduct this research study.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Nadeem Shafique Butt for providing his valuable insight and expertise in statistical analysis.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

Authors, Fahad Answer (FA) and Ahmad Azam Malik (AAM) contributed to the conception of the idea, study design, data collection, data analysis, and writing up of the manuscript of this study

REFERENCES

  • 1.WHO. World Health Organization (WHO)-Hypertension-Key facts: World Health Organization; 2021 [updated 25 August 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ hypertension.
  • 2.Salem H, Hasan DM, Eameash A, El-Mageed HA, Hasan S, Ali R. Worldwide prevalence of hypertension: A pooled meta-analysis of 1670 studies in 71 countries with 29.5 million participants. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71(11S):A1819-A. DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0735-1097(18)32360-X .
  • 3.Tu K, Chen Z, Lipscombe LL. Prevalence and incidence of hypertension from 1995 to 2005: a population-based study. CMAJ 2008; 178(11): 1429-35. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1503%2Fcmaj.071283.
  • 4.Furberg CD, Wright JT, Davis BR, Cutler JA, Alderman M, Black H, et al. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and LipidLowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). J Am Med Assoc 2002; 288(23): 2981-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/ jama.288.23.2981.
  • 5.Tailakh A, Evangelista LS, Mentes JC, Pike NA, Phillips LR, Morisky DE. Hypertension prevalence, awareness, and control in Arab countries: A systematic review. Nurs Health Sci 2014; 16(1): 126-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fnhs.12060 .
  • 6.Yusufali AM, Khatib R, Islam S, Alhabib KF, Bahonar A, Swidan HM, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in four Middle East countries. J Hypertens 2017; 35(7): 1457-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000001326
  • 7.Gabal MS, Abd Elaziz KM, Mostafa NS, Khallaf MK. Prevalence of hypertension and quality of life among hypertensive patients in an Egyptian village. Egypt J Communit Med 2018; 36(2): 23-35.
  • 8.Khader Y, Batieha A, Jaddou H, Rawashdeh SI, El-Khateeb M, Hyassat D, et al. Hypertension in Jordan: prevalence, awareness, control, and its associated factors. Int J Hypertens 2019; 2019: 3210617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3210617
  • 9.Memish ZA, Jaber S, Mokdad AH, AlMazroa MA, Murray CJ, Al Rabeeah AA, et al. Burden of disease, injuries, and risk factors in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 1990–2010. Prev Chronic Dis 2014; 11: E169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.140176 .
  • 10.Saeed AA, Al-Hamdan NA, Bahnassy AA, Abdalla AM, Abbas MA, Abuzaid LZ. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among Saudi adult population: a national survey. Int J Hypertens 2011; 2011: 174135. DOI: https://doi. org/10.4061/2011/174135
  • 11. El Bcheraoui C, Memish ZA, Tuffaha M, Daoud F, Robinson M, Jaber S, et al. Hypertension and its associated risk factors in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2013: a national survey. Int J Hypertens 2014; 2014: 564679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/564679
  • 12.Ahmed AM, Hersi A, Mashhoud W, Arafah MR, Abreu PC, Al Rowaily MA, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors burden in Saudi Arabia: the Africa Middle East cardiovascular epidemiological (ACE) study. J Saudi Heart Assoc 2017; 29(4): 235-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jsha.2017.03.004
  • 13. MOH. Health Awareness -World Hypertension Day-Key facts Saudi Arabia: Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia; 2018 [cited 2022 08-01-2022]. Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/ HealthAwareness/healthDay/2018/Pages/HealthDay-2018-05-17. aspx.
  • 14.Oh YS, Galis ZS. Anatomy of success: the top 100 cited scientific reports focused on hypertension research. Hypertension 2014; 63(4): 641-7. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1161%2FHYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02677
  • 15. Devos P, Ménard J. Trends in worldwide research in hypertension over the period 1999-2018: a bibliometric study. Hypertension. 2020; 76(5): 1649-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/ hypertensionaha.120.15711
  • 16.Devos P, Menard J. Bibliometric analysis of research relating to hypertension reported over the period 1997-2016. J Hypertens 2019; 37(11): 2116-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ hjh.0000000000002143
  • 17. . Bank W. “Saudi Arabia - World Bank Data,” The World Bank; 2019 [Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/country/SA
  • 18. Jelercic S, Lingard H, Spiegel W, Pichlhöfer O, Maier M. Assessment of publication output in the field of general practice and family medicine and by general practitioners and general practice institutions. Fam Pract 2010; 27(5): 582-9. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmq032
  • 19. Clarivate Analytics (Formerly Thomson Reuters), Web of Science (WoS) [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://clarivate.com/ webofsciencegroup/solutions/web-of-science/
  • 20. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr. 2017; 11(4): 959-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  • 21. ARWU. The Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) 2021 [Available from: https://www.shanghairanking.com/