Original Article
Effect of Tobacco Use during Pregnancy on Fetal Birth Weight Born to Women between 18-35 years in Thatta District
Authors: Tasneem Mufaddal , Sameera Ali Rizvi , SyedaTabeena Ali
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37184/lnjpc.2707-3521.6.37
Year: 2024
Volume: 6
Received: Aug 25, 2023
Revised: Feb 16, 2024
Accepted: Feb 26, 2024
Corresponding Auhtor: Tasneem Mufaddal (tasneemmufaddal7@gmail.com)
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License
Effect of Tobacco Use during Pregnancy on Fetal Birth Weight Born to Women between 18-35 years in Thatta District
Abstract
Background: Consumption of tobacco in its various forms is widespread and a serious public health issue globally. Although smoking is the predominant common method of tobacco use, the consumption of smokeless tobacco has increased in recent decades. Smokeless tobacco products are becoming more popular among women. In Pakistan, the overall prevalence of smokeless tobacco among males and females is 7%, out of which 10% are women which may be linked to poor reproductive outcomes and other health issues.
Objective: The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of smokeless tobacco use during pregnancy on fetal birth weight.
Methods: A case-control study was conducted at the five basic health units (BHU) of Thatta District, which were Garho, Ghora Bari, Dhabeji, Chattochand, and Jhimpeer from October 2022 – January 2023. A total of 300 mothers were included by consecutive sampling technique in the study and among them, 150 mothers who gave birth to a low-birth-weight baby i.e., birth weight < 2.5 kg were enrolled as a case, and another 150 mothers who gave birth to a normal birth weight baby i.e., birth weight ≥ 2.5 kg were enrolled as a control. Data collection involved face-to-face interviews utilizing a validated questionnaire, with strict adherence to ethical considerations throughout the study.
Results: In a study of 300 participants from Thatta District’s five basic healthcare units, multivariate logistic regression revealed significant factors influencing tobacco use during pregnancy. Housewives had 1.862 times higher odds of tobacco use than employed individuals, and individuals aged 20–35 had 1.802 times higher odds than those aged 36-50. Smokeless tobacco, particularly most of the mothers in this study used gutka (47.3%) and chaliya (26%). Smokeless tobacco Gutka and Chaliya, increased the likelihood of tobacco use during pregnancy. Considering the frequency of smokeless tobacco use and healthcare provider recommendations emerged as important determinants.
Conclusion: Our study underscores the prevalence of smokeless tobacco use during pregnancy in Thatta, Karachi, Pakistan, with significant implications for low-birth-weight babies. This highlights the need for targeted public health interventions, like antenatal care, alongside further research to inform evidence-based strategies for maternal and child health promotion in the region.
Keywords: Smokeless tobacco, birth weight, low birth weight, Thatta Pakistan.
INTRODUCTION
World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that tobacco use kills more than 7 million people each year, and if it continues, it will kill 8 million people annually by 2030 [1]. Although smoking is the primary method of tobacco use, the use of smokeless tobacco has been observed on the rise in the past few decades [1]. The use of smokeless tobacco products is a global public health concern. It is estimated that there are around 300 million individuals worldwide who use smokeless tobacco. Smokeless tobacco products are comparatively cheaper than factory-made cigarettes and they are typically banned in public places, making them attractive to young people [2, 3].
In Pakistan, the overall prevalence of smokeless tobacco among males and females is 7%, out of which 10% of the women are SLT consumers in different forms such as gutka, paan, and naswar [2]. Smokeless tobacco consumption has been on the rise among women [4].
This may be associated with negative reproductive outcomes and other health-related problems [1, 5, 6]. The consumption of SLT among women has shown a significant association between adverse birth outcomes such as low birth weight and preterm delivery [3, 5, 7]. Low birth weight has been defined by WHO as a weight at birth of < 2500 grams (5.5 pounds) [8, 9].
A study found Southeast Asia at the top of the chart with the highest rates of consumption [8, 9]. According to the National Health Survey (NHS) of Pakistan, approximately 10% of females aged 25–64 years reported consistent use of chewing tobacco or snuff, and over 7% of women smoked ‘huqqa’ which is associated with maternal cigarette smoking [10, 11]. Women in rural areas are more prone to use smokeless tobacco [12]. Women in rural areas dominantly use tobacco every day in at least one form either in smoking or smokeless form [9]. Prior studies have investigated the effect of maternal smoking on LBW and other neonatal outcomes and have also found a clear descent [13, 14].
Evidence suggests that infants born to mothers who use smokeless tobacco during pregnancy have a higher risk
of several adverse outcomes such as preterm birth, and low birth weight [1, 5, 9, 15]. Many types of research have proven the association between the consumption of tobacco during pregnancy and the impact on one’s health. This study will determine the association consumption of tobacco during pregnancy and the impact it will have on the weight of the baby. Maternal health and tobacco use are already very important public health issues and through this study, we aim to target the population that does not have the resources and exposure to know better about the outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A case-control study was carried out from October 2022 to January 2023 in the selected primary healthcare settings of Thatta district, Sindh, Pakistan. Consecutive sampling was used to select 300 participants in total,
150 participants in each group. Mothers who gave birth to a low-birth-weight baby i.e., birth weight < 2.5 kg were selected as a case, and mothers who gave birth to a normal birth weight baby i.e., birth weight ≥
2.5 kg were selected as a control. The sample size was calculated by the WHO sample size calculator by taking a percentage of smokeless tobacco (SLT) among low- birthweight (LBW) at 68.6% and among normal weight at 31.33% [16], with the power of test 90% and 99% confidence level. The estimated sample size came out as 90 in each group. To increase the efficacy of the result we have increased the sample size to 300 total which means 150 participants in each group. All participants signed the informed consent and ethical approval was taken to conduct this study from the Institute of Ethical Review Board (IERB -220156).
At the time of delivery, if the fetus is born with a birth weight of less than 2.5 kg, the mother was selected as a case, according to the eligibility criteria. Mothers who gave birth to a normal birth weight baby i.e., birth weight
≥ 2.5 kg were selected as a control. For every case, a consecutive control was recruited. The case-to-control ratio was 1:1. Mother and baby were enrolled in the study within one day of delivery.
All the pregnant women who were coming for the delivery were enrolled in the study according to the eligibility criteria. Pregnant women who came for delivery at the basic healthcare unit were selected. After the delivery, the weight of the baby was checked and if it is a low- birth-weight baby the mother was asked to answer the questions related to the study. The eligibility criteria included mothers aged between 18 and 35 years.
The mother delivering at 37 weeks or more, mothers using smokeless tobacco and practicing smoking during this pregnancy and are prone to passive smoking, delivered within one day of selection in the study, and the newborn’s age is less than 24 hours. Exclusion criteria, mothers who have a history of stillbirths or miscarriages will not be selected, mothers delivering twin babies, mothers who used to smoke before pregnancy but
stopped during pregnancy, and newborns with congenital
anomalies wias excluded.
Data was collected by formulating a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire included sections on socio-demographic information, previous pregnancy history, factors associated with the use of smokeless tobacco consumption during pregnancy, and recent birth information. Furthermore, the birthweight of the newborn was measured immediately at the time of birth or within one day, gestational age in weeks was noted at the time of delivery and maternal complications will be assessed. The data was administered through face- to-face interviews after delivery with enrolled mothers of both groups.
An informed consent form was signed, or a thumb impression was taken by the mother before they were enrolled in the study. Confidentiality of the mother and newborn was maintained and ensured that they did not face any problems during the interview. All data of the newborn as well as the mother was kept confidential.
Data were tested for comprehensiveness and entered into SPSS analysis to calculate the mean and SD for continuous variables and the percentage for categorical variables was computed. Associations of the outcome with each independent variable were estimated by independent t-test or chi-square test. The level of statistical significance was put as p-value ≤0.05. Binary logistic regression was applied to compute the adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval was computed to measure the association between the dependent variable and the independent variable by using SPSS version 21.
RESULTS
The sample of 300 participants was equally divided among the five basic healthcare units of Thatta District, and a minimum of 60 respondents were interviewed from each basic healthcare unit (BHU). Results of 300 respondents of the five BHU Garho, Ghora Bari, Dhabeji, Chattochand, and Jhimpeer with a response rate of 100% are being presented.
This study examined the effect of smokeless tobacco usage during pregnancy and the effect it has on the birth weight of the fetus in Thatta, District. The estimated prevalence of the use of smokeless tobacco among the 300 respondents both cases and controls were around 60% either in the form of gutka, chaliya, paan, or naswar in the district of Thatta, Pakistan and most of them live in rural areas, and were illiterate. The majority of the women used gutka which was the predominant type of SLT (47.3%), (34%), and chaliya (26%), (14.6%) among cases and controls respectively. Paan and naswar were used as a subsidiary in comparison with gutka and chaliya.
In Table 1 significant associations were found between
low birth weight and maternal occupation (p=0.020), with
Table 1: Analysis shows an association between low birth weight and socio-demographic information among mothers aged 18-35 years in Thatta District.
Variable | Cases (n=150) | Control (n=150) |
OR | 95% CI |
p- value |
n (%) | n (%) | lower upper | |||
Maternal Age in Yrs. | |||||
18 – 26 years | 38 (25.3) | 35 (23.3) | 1.115 | 0.658 1.890 | 0.686 |
27 – 35 years* | 112 (74.6) | 115 (76.6) | |||
Maternal Level of Education | |||||
Illiterate | 133 (88.6) | 124 (82.6) | 1.640 | 0.849 3.169 | 0.138 |
Primary and above* | 17 (11.3) | 26 (17.3) | |||
Maternal Occupation | |||||
Housewife | 119 (79.3) | 101 (67.3) | 1.862 | 1.105 3.139 | 0.020 |
Employed* | 31 (20.6) | 49 (32.6) | |||
Husband’s Age in Yrs. | |||||
20 – 35 years | 107 (71.3) | 87 (57.9) | 1.802 | 1.115 2.912 | 0.016 |
36 – 50 years* | 43 (28.6) | 63 (42.1) | |||
Husband’s Level of Education | |||||
Illiterate | 124 (82.6) | 119 (79.3) | 1.242 | 0.697 2.216 | 0.462 |
Primary and above* | 26 (17.3) | 31 (20.6) | |||
Husband’s Occupation | |||||
Employed* | 130 (86.6) | 138 (92) | 0.565 | 0.266 1.202 | 0.135 |
Unemployed | 20 (13.3) | 12 (8) | |||
Ethnicity of Mother | |||||
Sindhi speaking | 119 (79.3) | 127 (84.6) |
0.695 | 0.384 1.260 |
0.229 |
Balochi speaking & other * | 31 (20.6) | 23 (15.3) | |||
Family Type | |||||
Nuclear* | 85 (56.6) | 84 (56) | 0.973 | 0.617 1.536 | 0.907 |
Joint | 65 (43.3) | 66 (44) | |||
Monthly Household Income | |||||
5000 – 20000 PKR | 102 (68) | 98 (65.3) |
1.128 | 0.697 |
0.624 |
21000 – 40000 PKR or more* | 48 (32) | 52 (34.6) | 1.823 | ||
CI: Odds ratio, OR: Odds ratio, *Reference category
Table 2: Analysis shows an association between low birth weight and previous pregnancy history among mothers aged 18 – 35 years in Thatta District.
Variable | Cases (n=150) | Control (n=150) | OR | 95% CI |
P- value |
n (%) | n (%) |
| lower upper | ||
No. of Live Births | |||||
1 – 3* | 101 (67.3) | 102 (68) | 0.970 | 0.598 1.574 | 0.902 |
4 – 5 or more | 49 (32.6) | 48 (32) | |||
Age of the Mother at First Delivery in Yrs. | |||||
18 – 25 years | 135 (90) | 128 (85.3) | 1.547 | 0.769 3.113 | 0.219 |
26 – 32* years | 15 (10) | 22 (14.6) | |||
Previous History of LBW | |||||
Yes | 26 (17.3) | 16 (10.6) | 1.756 | 0.900 3.428 | 0.096 |
No* | 124 (82.6) | 134 (89.3) | |||
Previous History of Preterm Delivery | |||||
Yes | 30 (20) | 25 (16.6) | 1.250 | 0.695 2.248 | 0.456 |
No* | 120 (80) | 125 (83.3) | |||
ANC Visits in Previous Pregnancies | |||||
Yes* | 83 (55.3) | 81 (54) | 1.055 | 0.670 1.663 | 0.817 |
No | 67 (44.6) | 69 (46) | |||
CI: Odds ratio, OR: Odds ratio, *Reference category
housewives having higher odds, and husband’s age (p=0.016), indicating increased odds for mothers with husbands aged 20-35 years compared to those aged 36-50 years.
Analysis of 300 mothers aged 18-35 in Thatta District reveals a significant association between low birth weight and previous pregnancy history. Mothers with 4-5 or more live births had a lower odds ratio (OR=0.970, 95% CI: 0.598-1.574, p=0.902), while those aged 26-32
Table 3: Analysis shows an association between low birth weight and factors associated with smokeless tobacco consumption during pregnancy among mothers aged 18 – 35 years in Thatta District.
Variable | Cases (n=150) | Control (n=150) |
OR | 95% CI |
p- value |
n (%) | n (%) | lower upper | |||
Smokeless Tobacco Consumption | |||||
Yes | 106 (70.6) | 82 (54.6) | 1.998 | 1.241 3.217 | 0.004 |
No* | 44 (29.3) | 68 (45.3) | |||
Age at which You Started Using SLT in Yrs. | |||||
0 – 13 years | 105 (70) | 115 (76.6) | 0.710 | 0.424 1.188 | 0.192 |
14 - 29* years | 45 (30) | 35 (23.3) | |||
Type of Smokeless Tobacco that You Use | |||||
Gutka |
0.019 | ||||
Yes | 71 (47.3) | 51 (34) | 1.745 | 1.095 2.779 | |
No* | 79 (52.6) | 99 (66) | |||
Paan |
1.000 | ||||
Yes | 10 (6.6) | 10 (6.6) | 1.000 | 0.404 2.478 | |
No* | 140 (93.3) | 140 (93.3) | |||
Naswar |
0.343 | ||||
Yes | 18 (12) | 13 (8.6) | 1.437 | 0.677 3.049 | |
No* | 132 (88) | 137 (91.3) | |||
Chaliya |
0.015 | ||||
Yes | 39 (26) | 22 (14.6) | 2.044 | 1.143 3.655 | |
No* | 111 (74) | 128 (85.3) | |||
Smokeless Tobacco Use During the Current Pregnancy | |||||
Yes | 106 (70.6) | 82 (54.6) | 1.998 | 1.241 3.217 | 0.004 |
No* | 44 (29.3) | 68 (45.3) | |||
Household Smokeless Tobacco Production | |||||
Yes | 18 (12) | 12 (8) | 1.568 | 0.727 3.382 | 0.248 |
No* | 132 (88) | 138 (92) | |||
Family Members Use Smokeless Tobacco | |||||
Yes | 110 (73.3) | 109 (72.6) | 1.034 | 0.621 1.722 | 0.897 |
No* | 40 (26.6) | 41 (27.3) | |||
Usage of Smokeless Tobacco Per Day | |||||
0 – 2 times per day | 70 (46.6) | 96 (64) |
0.492 | 0.310 0.782 |
0.004 |
3 - ≥ 5 times per day* | 80 (53.3) | 54 (36) | |||
Ever Tried to Quit the use of Smokeless Tobacco | |||||
Yes* | 40 (26.6) | 36 (24) | 1.152 | 0.684 1.939 | 0.595 |
No | 110 (73.3) | 114 (76) | |||
Ever Tried to Quit Smokeless Tobacco and HCP Recommended You Quit | |||||
No | 49 (32.6) | 69 (46) | 1.756 | 1.099 2.805 | 0.018 |
Yes* | 101 (67.3) | 81 (54) | |||
Success in Quitting Tobacco | |||||
Yes* | 4 (2.6) | 3 (2) | 1.342 | 0.295 6.104 | 0.702 |
No | 146 (97.3) | 147 (96) | |||
CI: Odds ratio, OR: Odds ratio, *Reference category
Table 4: Analysis shows an association between low birth weight and delivery-related information among mothers aged 18 – 35 years in Thatta District.
Variable | Cases (n=150) | Control (n=150) |
OR | 95% CI |
p- value |
n (%) | n (%) | lower upper | |||
Gestation Age in weeks | |||||
37 weeks – 38 weeks | 115 (76.6) | 109 (72.6) |
1.236 |
0.734 2.082 |
0.426 |
39 weeks – 40 weeks or more* | 35 (23.3) | 41 (27.3) | |||
CI: Odds ratio, OR: Odds ratio, *Reference category
at first delivery showed higher odds (OR=1.547, 95% CI: 0.769-3.113, p=0.219). Previous history of low birth weight (LBW) exhibited significance (OR=1.756, 95% CI: 0.900-3.428, p=0.096), unlike previous preterm delivery (OR=1.250, 95% CI: 0.695-2.248, p=0.456) and ANC visits (OR=1.055, 95% CI: 0.670-1.663, p=0.817)
Table 2.
The analysis revealed a significant association between
low birth weight and smokeless tobacco consumption
during pregnancy among mothers aged 18 – 35 years in Thatta District. Notably, smokeless tobacco consumption, Gutka usage, smokeless tobacco use during the current pregnancy, and HCP recommendation to quit tobacco were significantly associated with low birth weight (p < 0.05) Table 3.
Table 4 reveals a significant link between low birth weight and delivery-related factors among mothers aged 18-35 in Thatta District, with those delivering at 39 weeks or more showing a higher odds ratio (OR=1.236, 95% CI: 0.734-2.082, p=0.426) compared to deliveries at 39-40 weeks.
The factors of tobacco use during pregnancy by analyzing 150 cases and 150 controls through multivariate logistic regression. The study found significant associations between several variables and the probability of tobacco use during pregnancy. Tables 1 and 5 show maternal occupation played a crucial role, with housewives having 1.721 times higher odds of tobacco use compared to employed individuals. Husband’s age was also a factor, with those aged 20 – 35 having 1.802 times higher odds
Table 5: Regression Analysis of Variables with Significantly Low P-Values (< 0.025).
Variables | Cases (n=150) | Control (n=150) | Univariate Logistic Regression | Multivariate Logistic Regression | ||||
OR | 95% CI | p-value | aOR | 95% CI | p-value | |||
Maternal Occupation |
1.862 |
1.105-3.139 |
0.020 |
1.8721 |
1.241-3.130 |
0.012 | ||
Housewife | 119 (79.3) | 101 (67.3) | ||||||
Employed* | 31 (20.6) | 49 (32.6) | ||||||
Husband’s Age |
1.802 |
1.115-2.912 |
0.016 |
1.841 |
1.165-2.872 |
0.011 | ||
20 – 35 years | 107 (71.3) | 87 (57.9) | ||||||
36 - 50* years | 43 (28.6) | 63 (42.1) | ||||||
Smokeless Tobacco Consumption |
1.998 |
1.241-3.217 |
0.004 |
2.412 |
1.441-3.328 |
0.001 | ||
Yes | 106 (70.6) | 82 (54.6) | ||||||
No* | 44 (29.3) | 68 (45.3) | ||||||
Type of Smokeless Tobacco Used |
1.745 |
1.095-2.779 |
0.019 |
1.967 |
1.179-3.281 |
0.010 | ||
Gutka | ||||||||
Yes | 71 (47.3) | 51 (34) | ||||||
No* | 79 (52.6) | 99 (66) | ||||||
Paan |
1.000 |
0.404-2.478 |
1.000 |
1.587 |
0.612-4.116 |
0.342 | ||
Yes | 10 (6.6) | 10 (6.6) | ||||||
No* | 140 (93.3) | 140 (93.3) | ||||||
Naswar |
1.437 |
0.677-3.049 |
0.343 |
2.257 |
1.010-5.044 |
0.047 | ||
Yes | 18 (12) | 13 (8.6) | ||||||
No* | 132 (88) | 137 (91.3) | ||||||
Chaliya |
2.044 |
1.143-3.655 |
0.015 |
2.009 |
1.106-3.647 |
0.022 | ||
Yes | 39 (26) | 22 (14.6) | ||||||
No* | 111 (74) | 128 (85.3) | ||||||
Tobacco Use During Pregnancy |
1.998 |
1.241-3.217 |
0.004 |
1.999 |
1.221-3.242 |
0.005 | ||
Yes | 106 (70.6) | 82 (54.6) | ||||||
No* | 44 (29.3) | 68 (45.3) | ||||||
Usage of Smokeless Tobacco Per Day |
0.492 |
0.310-0.782 |
0.004 |
0.492 |
0.310-0.782 |
0.003 | ||
0 – 2 times per day | 70 (46.6) | 96 (64) | ||||||
3 - ≥ 5 times per day* | 80 (53.3) | 54 (36) | ||||||
During Your Visit to the Health Facility, the HCP Recommended You Quit Tobacco |
1.756 |
1.099-2.805 |
0.018 |
1.756 |
1.099-2.805 |
0.019 | ||
No | 49 (32.6) | 69 (46) | ||||||
Yes* | 101 (67.3) | 81 (54) | ||||||
CI: confidence interval, aOR: adjusted odds ratio OR: Odds ratio (reference category)*
than those aged 36-50 Smokeless tobacco consumption, particularly the use of Gutka and Chaliya, was associated with increased odds of tobacco use during pregnancy Tables 3 and 5. Additionally, the frequency of smokeless tobacco use per day and healthcare provider recommendations to quit tobacco were significant determinants in Tables 3 and 5. There was no association between low birth weight and previous pregnancy history among mothers aged 18 – 35 years Tables 2 and 5. Table 4 shows no association between LBW and gestational age. The results underscore the importance of considering multiple factors in understanding and addressing tobacco use during pregnancy
DISCUSSION
The impact of tobacco use during pregnancy on fetal birth weight is a topic of significant concern and interest, particularly among women aged 18-35 years in Thatta District. Understanding the potential effects of tobacco use on birth outcomes in this demographic is crucial for informing public health interventions and policies aimed at promoting maternal and child well-being. In this discussion, we delve into the findings of our study, exploring the implications of tobacco use on fetal birth weight and the broader implications for maternal and child health in the region.
When we compared the present study with another study conducted in Dhaka the results show the frequency of LBW delivery among SLT users was 58.2 and among non-SLT users was 27.7% in Dhaka [5], similar results when compared to this study.
A hospital-based cohort study found similar implications for the birth weight that reported the use of mishri had an association with the weight of the baby [5, 17]. A study conducted in Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, found that the odds of having low birth weight babies were
5.84 times higher in the mothers exposed to passive smoking than in unexposed [17, 18] whereas this study along with other studies did not find any association of passive smoking on the birth weight of the baby [7]. The variation in prevalence might be due to the difference in geographical location, population, socioeconomic status, previous history of low-birth-weight babies, passive smoking exposure, frequency of SLT used by mothers, gender biases, household tobacco production, and gestation age.
The mean age of the women was 29.03 (± 4.17) and
28.73 (± 3.70) for cases and controls respectively. Stating that the majority of the women delivered when they were aged 28-29, women who turn 30 have complications during their pregnancy resulting in pre-term delivery, low birth weight, stillbirth, etc. This likely reflects the increased risk of having a low-birth-weight baby with consumption of tobacco use during pregnancy. These results were similar to previous findings reported by [10, 19]. Some studies also suggest that nearly half of the female population is anemic and malnourished which
can also be one of the factors that contribute to LBW
babies [1, 9].
A similar study conducted in Bangladesh established that the potentiality of delivery of LBW babies among non-SLT mothers was 3.7 times lower than those who consumed smokeless tobacco [5]. One of the studies also shows that mothers who stopped using SLT during their first-second trimester were more likely to have a higher level of education, employment, and a slightly lower level of vulnerability than those who continued to smoke beyond the second trimester [4]. Women who quit smoking in the third trimester or who smoked throughout their pregnancy had lower levels of education than non- smokers this study also had similar findings [4].
One of the studies also suggests that exposure to second-hand smoke makes pregnant women exposed as well and it is more likely that pregnant women are most likely to start the use of SLT due to cultural discipline [20, 21]. A study in Bangladesh found that maternal SLT use in pregnancy was significantly associated with LBW babies and carries a risk of having LBW babies 4.6 times more than non-ST users. These findings conform with the results of the current study.
It is worth noting that smoking SLT is significantly associated with low-birth-weight babies, as well as other complications including high blood pressure, gestational diabetes, infections, preeclampsia, preterm labor, depression, anxiety, pregnancy loss, stillbirth, and others during pregnancy. However, there are several limitations to this some mothers were confused about the age at which they started the use of smokeless tobacco, which led to recall biases however the strength of this study was that data was collected from areas of a high prevalence of SLT consumption.
CONCLUSION
The study highlights that exposure to tobacco use during pregnancy has been a contributing element in adverse maternal outcomes. Smokeless tobacco is inexpensive and easily available to women around the world, especially in rural areas. This study documented the effect of smokeless tobacco use during pregnancy on fetal birth weight in Thatta, District highlighting the need for targeted public health interventions, like antenatal care, alongside further research to inform evidence- based strategies for maternal and child health promotion in the region.
ETHICAL APPROVAL
Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Review Board of SZABIST, Karachi (REF letter No. IERB-220156). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were following the ethical standards of the institutional and/ or national research committee and with the Helsinki Declaration.
CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION
Written informed consent was taken from the participants.
AVAILABILITY OF DATA
The data set may be acquired from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request.
FUNDING
Declared none.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank PPHI for granting permission to conduct the research at their respected BHUs in Thatta, District.
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION
All the authors contributed equally to the publication of this article.
REFERENCES
Laldinsangi C. Toxic effects of smokeless tobacco on female reproductive health: A Curr Res Toxicol 2022; 3: 100066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crtox.2022.100066
Singh PK, Jain P, Singh N, Singh L, Singh S. Smokeless tobacco use among pregnant women in India: the tale of two nationally representative Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention: APJCP 2022; 23(2): 389. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.2.389
Gould GS, Havard A, Lim LL, The Psanz Smoking In Pregnancy Expert Group, Kumar R. Exposure to tobacco, environmental tobacco smoke and nicotine in pregnancy: a pragmatic overview of reviews of maternal and child outcomes, effectiveness of interventions and barriers and facilitators to quitting. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(6): DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph17062034
Delcroix-Gomez C, Delcroix MH, Jamee A, Gauthier T, Marquet P, Aubard Y. Fetal growth restriction, low birth weight, and preterm birth: Effects of active or passive smoking evaluated by maternal expired CO at delivery, impacts of cessation at different Tob Induc Dis 2022; 20: 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18332/ tid/152111
Hossain MM, Rahman ME, Begum S, Mollah MS, Hossain MM, Alam MD. Effect of maternal smokeless tobacco use during pregnancy on neonatal outcome-a hospital-based Sch J App Med Sci 2022; 8: 1260-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36347/ sjams.2022.v10i08.016
Abdeta T, Hunduma G. Tobacco use among reproductive age women in Ethiopia: evidence from the national health Subst Abuse and Rehabil 2021; 12: 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ SAR.S291869
Hu K, Zou S, Zhang CJ, Wu H, Akinwunmi B, Wang Z, et al. Health-related quality of life among pregnant women with pre- pregnancy smoking and smoking cessation during pregnancy in China: national cross-sectional JMIR Public Health Surveill 2022; 8(1): e29718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/29718
Ali SA, Khan U, Abrejo F, Vollmer B, Saleem S, Hambidge KM, et Use of smokeless tobacco before conception and its relationship with maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancy in Thatta, Pakistan: Findings from women first study. Nicotine Tob Res 2021; 23(8): 1291-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa215
Aziz Ali S, Khan U, Abrejo F, Vollmer B, Saleem S, Hambidge KM, Krebs NF, Westcott JE, Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Pasha O. Use of Smokeless Tobacco Before Conception and Its Relationship With Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Pregnancy in Thatta, Pakistan: Findings From Women First Study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Aug 4;23(8):1291-1299. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa215. PMID: 33084903; PMCID: PMC8360631.
Rozi S, Butt ZA, Zahid N, Wasim S, Shafique K. Association of tobacco use and other determinants with pregnancy outcomes: a multicentre hospital-based case - control study in Karachi, Pakistan. BMJ open 2016; 6(9): e012045. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012045
Sajid TZ, Usmani RA, Mumtaz U, Riffat N, Baig S, Cheema MH. Association of low birth weight with environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure among pregnant women. Professional Med J 2022; 29(4): 448-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29309/ TPMJ/2022.29.04.6274
Islam S, Rana MJ, Mohanty SK. Cooking, smoking, and stunting: Effects of household air pollution sources on childhood growth in India. Indoor Air 2021; 31(1): 229-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 12730
Singh M, Kaushik NK, Sharma R, Pareek Consequences of maternal smoking during pregnancy on maternal and fetal outcomes. J Nurse Midwifery Matern Health 2020; 6(2): 57-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/jnmmh.2454.7506.6220.7
Popova S, Dozet D, O’Hanlon G, Temple V, Rehm J. Maternal alcohol use, adverse neonatal outcomes and pregnancy complications in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21: 74. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1186/s12884-021-03545-7
Fazel N, Kundi M, Kazemzadeh A, Esmaily H, Akbarzadeh R, Ahmadi R. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure during pregnancy affects complications and birth outcomes in women with and without asthma. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2020; 20(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03000-z
Hoque M, Rahman ME, Dey PR. Pregnancy outcome of mothers who used smokeless tobacco for five years or Bangladesh J Child Health 2011; 35(1): 6-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/BJCH. V35I1.10366
Ganganahalli P, Pratinidhi A, Patil J, Kakade SV. Correlation of cotinine levels with use of smokeless tobacco (mishri) among pregnant women and anthropometry of newborn. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11(3): LC16-LC19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/ jcdr/2017/23340.9534
Kataoka, M.C., Carvalheira, A.P.P., Ferrari, A.P. et al. Smoking during pregnancy and harm reduction in birth weight: a cross- sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 18, 67 (2018). https:// org/10.1186/s12884-018-1694-4
Cardenas VM, Ali MM, Fischbach LA, Nembhard WN. Dual use of cigarettes and electronic nicotine delivery systems during pregnancy and the risk of small for gestational age neonates. Ann Epidemiol 2020; 52: 86-92.e2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. 2020.08.002
Ngo CQ, Phan PT, Vu GV, Chu HT, Nguyen TT, Nguyen MH, et Prevalence and sources of second-hand smoking exposure among non-smoking pregnant women in an urban setting of Vietnam. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16(24): 5022. DOI: https://doi. org/10.3390/ijerph16245022
Günther V, Alkatout I, Vollmer C, Maass N, Strauss A, Voigt M. Impact of nicotine and maternal BMI on fetal birth weight. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Feb 12;21(1):127. doi: 10.1186/ s12884-021-03593-z. PMID: 33579212; PMCID: PMC7881635.