Original Article


Factors Affecting Awareness of Oral Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study from a One-Day Free Consultation Camp in Karachi

Authors: Syed Mohsin Abbas Abidi , Syed Imtiaz Ahmed Jafry , Syeda Zeenat Raza Rizvi , Syed Muhammad Zulfiqar Hyder Naqvi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37184/lnjpc.2707-3521.4.23
Year: 2022
Volume: 4
Corresponding Auhtor: Syeda Zeenat Raza Rizvi (zeenat141@hotmail.com)
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License



Abstract

Background: The nursing profession has been identified as an increasingly challenging profession. Depression, anxiety, and stress have been established considerably among nursing students that have a negative impact on personal and as well as education.

Objectives: To determine the frequency and correlation between depression, anxiety and stress among nursing students. Identify the association of socio-demographic variables with depression, anxiety, and stress among nursing students.

Methodology: A cross-sectional study was accomplished at two public sector nursing colleges in Islamabad. The duration of the study was 4 months from October 2021 to January 2022. Students who are enrolled in general nursing and BS nursing programs of both genders were invited to participate in the study. The calculated sample size was 355. Non-probability convenience sampling method was utilized to access study participants. DASS-21 questionnaire was used for screening depression, anxiety, and stress. A chi-square test was applied to identify the association of demographic variables with depression, anxiety, and stress. Pearson correlation was also used to determine the correlation between depression, anxiety, and stress. P-value ≤0.05 was considered a level of significance.

Results: A total of 355 participants were included, the majority of them 79.4% were from the age group 18 – 23 years. Most of the participants 80% were female and 89% were unmarried. In this study, the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress was reported at 44.2%, 64.20%, and 42.3% respectively. Educational programs and family history of psychiatric disorders were found to be statistically significant for depression. Moreover, gender, year of study, and educational program exhibited significant anxiety. In addition, years of study, educational program and residency were also established as significant with stress.

Conclusion: It is concluded from the current study that nursing students were facing significant levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. The anxiety levels were higher in participants followed by depression and stress. Moreover, there was a significant positive strong correlation between depression, anxiety, and stress.

Keywords: Anxiety, depression, stress, nursing students, education.

INTRODUCTION

Nursing is a practical discipline in which students learn theory and practice in the clinical areas, which counts as a double burden on students. The prevalence of depression 24.3%, anxiety 39.9%, and stress 20.0% has been established among nursing students. Furthermore, anxiety and depression were found far more prevalent in female nursing students while depression in male nursing students [1]. Low academic performance and absenteeism are identified as early signs of depression, anxiety, and stress among nursing students [2].

Moreover, education is a process that leads to stressful experiences and also students encounter considerable academic, social, and personal stress during their student tenure. Stress is well known to be associated with the progression of anxiety and depression and a positive relationship is established between stress, anxiety, and depression. The research study conducted in Sri Lanka demonstrated the utmost prevalence of 51.1%, 59.8%, and 82.6% of academic year, physical

& mental well-being, and satisfaction with nursing studies are the factors found statistically significant with depression, anxiety, and stress [3]. Similarly, an updated literature review disclosed a very high range of anxiety 7.7-65.5%, depression 6.0-66.5% and stress 12.2- 96.7% among medical students who were living outside of North America [4]. It is confirmed that depression, anxiety and stress can lead to decreasing in academic performance as well as clinical areas [5]. Sources of such types of the disorder may be faculty expectations, educational environment, health care personnel, senior nurses, clinical practice, patients’ and students’ lifestyle, and family background, financial issues, low support or other mates [6, 7].

Thus, causes can be internal and external. A research study revealed that depression and emotional attention predict suicidal ideation significantly [8]. There is documentary evidence of the possibility of preventing such types of disorders among nursing students by establishing family and school-based approaches [9].

In addition, one more research study revealed that students could receive counseling from the respective faculty through planned schedules to improve their psychological health and mental well-being [10]. Female

nursing candidates are at higher risk as compared to male candidates for mental health [11]. Besides, a study conducted in Karachi, Pakistan on medical students, revealed that 35.6 percent of students were found with suicidal ideation whereas 13.9 percent of students had the intention of a suicide attempt. However, only 4.8 percent of them managed to try throughout their lives [12]. Nursing students face several challenges during their course of nursing education which may cause certain physical as well as psychological disturbance which leads to poor academic performance. Consequently, the mental health status of candidates is relatively important in order to enhance academic performance and effective learning. Therefore, this research study was employed to determine the frequency and correlation between depression, anxiety, and stress and identify the association of socio-demographic variables with depression, anxiety, and stress among nursing students at the College of Nursing Federal Government Poly Clinic and College, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), in Islamabad, Pakistan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This descriptive cross-sectional study was accomplished at two public sector nursing colleges specifically the College of Nursing Federal Government Polyclinic and College of Nursing PIMS, Islamabad. The study was carried out for a period of 4 months from October 2021 to January 2022. The targeted populations of this study were all nursing students, who were studying in the diploma program, and BS Nursing at the College of Nursing Federal Government Polyclinic and College of Nursing PIMS, Islamabad. Both male and female nursing students of both nursing programs who were willing to participate in the study were included in the study. Students, who have any chronic disease like Diabetic Mellitus (DM) or HTN (Hypertension), were excluded from the study. Moreover, those students, who were taking psychotic medications, were also excluded from the study. The sample size was calculated through OpenEpi version 3.0, an online sample size calculator. It was calculated by taking 63.9% of depression [13] with a 95% confidence level and a 5% margin of error. The calculated sample size was 355 nursing students of both genders. Non-probability convenient sampling technique was used to assess the participants.

All students, who were studying at Federal Government Polyclinic and PIMS, Islamabad were approached physically to fill out the structured questionnaire at their institutes. Written informed consent was taken from all participants. Firstly, all students were invited to attend the introductory session of the present study. After that, a self-administered questionnaire was distributed among students and collected back almost after 30 minutes. Open accessed, structured, and validated questionnaire “depression, anxiety, and stress scale-21” (DASS- 21) [14] was used for this study. It is comprised of 04 points from 0-3 such as “0” did not apply to me at all “1” applied to me to some degree, or time “2” applied to me to a considerable degree or a good part of the time “3” applied to me very much or most of the time.” The normal cut-value of depression, anxiety, and stress is 0-9, 0-7, and 0-14 respectively. The mild cut-value of depression, anxiety, and stress is 10-13, 8-9, and 15-18 respectively. The moderate cut-value of depression, anxiety, and stress is 14-20, 10-14, and 19-25 respectively. The severe cut-value of depression, anxiety, and stress is 21- 27, 15-19, and 26-33 respectively. The extreme severe cut-value of depression, anxiety, and stress is 28+, 20+, and 34+ respectively. Data was entered and analyzed by using SPSS version

21. After checking the assumptions of normality with the Shapiro-wilk test, mean ± standard deviation was computed for all quantitative variables. Data was also analyzed in frequency and percentages for all qualitative variables. A chi-square test was applied to identify the association of demographic variables with depression, anxiety, and stress. Pearson correlation was also used to determine the correlation between depression, anxiety, and stress. P-value ≤0.05 was considered a level of statistical significance.

RESULTS

A total of 355 participants were included, the majority of them 282 (79.4%) were from the age group 18–23 years, followed by 24-29 years 50(14.1%), and 30-35 years 11(3.1%). Only 4(1.1%) had an age above 42 years. There is a dominancy of female respondents (80%). 136(38.3%) were in the third year of their study program followed by the first year 115(32.4%), 70(19.7%) in the second year, and 34(9.6%) in the final year. Almost all (96.6%) participants did not face any academic failure. Only a few (3.4%) had an academic failure during their study period. Concerning marital status, most of the subjects 316(89%) were unmarried, there is only 1(0.3%) widow participated in the study. As for smoking status, almost all (98.6%) study subjects did not smoke. Three-fourths of 276(77.7%) participants belonged to the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), while 79(22.3%) were from Poly Clinic Hospital.

Fig. (1): Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among respondents.

Table 1: Association of socio-demographic variables with depression, anxiety, and stress.

Variable

Depression

p-value

Anxiety

p-value

Stress

P-value

Yes n (%)

No n (%)

Yes n (%)

No n (%)

Yes n (%)

No n (%)

Age (In years)

18-29

145 (43.7)

187 (56.3)

0.156

215 (64.8)

117 (35.2)

0.501

138 (41.6)

194 (58.4)

0.384

30 & Above

12 (52.2)

11 (47.8)

13 (56.5)

10 (43.5)

12 (52.2)

11 (47.8)

Gender

Male

30 (42.3)

41 (57.7)

0.790

38 (53.5)

33 (46.5)

0.039

26 (36.6)

45 (63.4)

0.347

Female

127 (44.7)

157(55.3)

190 (66.9)

94 (33.1)

124 (43.7)

160 (56.3)

Year of Study

1

40 (34.8)

75 (65.2)

0.050

54 (47.0)

61(53.0)

<0.001*

37 (32.2)

78 (67.8)

0.004*

2

30 (42.9)

40 (57.1)

41 (58.6)

29 (41.4)

25 (35.7)

45 (64.3)

3

71 (52.2)

65 (47.8)

107 (78.7)

29 (21.3)

68 (50.0)

68 (50.0)

4

16 (47.1)

18 (52.9)

26 (76.5)

8 (23.5)

20 (58.8)

14 (41.2)

Academic Failure

Yes

7(58.3)

5 (41.7)

0.382

9 (75.0)

3 (25.0)

0.549

6 (50.0)

6 (50.0)

0.768

No

150 (43.7)

193 (56.3)

219 (63.8)

124 (36.2)

144 (42.0)

199 (58.0)

Marital Status

Single

141 (44.6)

175 (55.4)

0.443

206 (65.2)

110 (34.8)

0.365

136 (43.0)

180 (57.0)

0.531

Married/ Widow

16 (41.0)

23 (59.0)

22 (56.4)

17 (43.6)

14 (35.9)

25 (64.1)

Smoking

Yes

1 (20.0)

4 (80.0)

0.388

2 (40.0)

3 (60.0)

0.354

2 (40.0)

3 (60.0)

1.000

No

156 (44.6)

194 (55.4)

226 (64.6)

124 (35.4)

148 (42.3)

202 (57.7)

Institute

Federal/Poly Clinic

31 (39.2)

48 (60.8)

0.369

48 (60.8)

31 (39.2)

0.506

38 (48.1)

41 (51.9)

0.247

PIMS

126 (45.7)

150 (54.3)

180 (65.2)

96 (34.8)

112 (40.6)

164 (59.4)

Educational Program

Diploma

89 (51.1)

85 (48.9)

0.011*

135 (77.6)

39 (22.4)

<0.001*

89 (51.1)

85 (48.9)

0.001*

BSN

68 (37.6)

113 (62.4)

93 (51.4)

88 (48.6)

61(33.7)

120 (66.3)

Residency

With family

66 (52.4)

60 (47.6)

0.146

90 (71.4)

36 (28.6)

0.158

66 (52.4)

60 (47.6)

0.012*

With relative

7 (43.8)

9 (56.3)

8 (50.0)

8 (50.0)

7 (43.8)

9 (56.3)

With Friends

5 (38.5)

8 (61.5)

8 (61.5)

5 (38.5)

2 (15.4)

11 (84.6)

Hostel

79 (39.5)

121 (60.5)

122 (61.0)

78 ((39.0)

75 (37.5)

125 (62.5)

Family History of Psychiatric Disorder

Yes

6 (50.0)

6 (50.0)

0.003*

8 (66.7)

4 (33.3)

0.097

5 (41.7)

7 (58.3)

0.074

No

132 (41.5)

186 (58.5)

199 (62.6)

119 (37.4)

129 (40.6)

189 (59.4)

Don’t Know

19 (76.0)

6 (24.0)

21 (84.0)

4 (16.0)

16 (64.0)

9 (36.0)

*Significant at p<0.05

As far as their educational program is concerned, almost equal participation was from both the diploma 174(49%) and BSN 181(51%) programs. Moreover, more than half of 200(56.3%) were living in hostel accommodation followed by 126(35.5%) with family, 16(4.5%) with relatives, and 13(3.7%) with friends. Furthermore, only 12(3.4%) had a positive family history of psychiatric disorders.

Fig. (1) exhibits the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among study participants. In this study, the prevalence of depression was reported 44.2%, anxiety 64.2%, and stress 42.3%.

Table 1 expressed chi-square statistics to measure the association of baseline characteristics of respondents with depression, anxiety, and stress. The table explained that half of the participants from the diploma program had

depressive symptoms. This proportion was significantly higher compared with the BSN program (p=0.011). Furthermore, a family history of psychiatric disorder had a significant association with depression (p=0.003).

Concerning the association between anxiety and demographic characteristics, gender was found in statistically significant association. Females examined in this study had a significantly higher proportion than males having anxiety symptoms (p=0.039). Three- fourths of the participants from the third year (78.7%) and fourth year (76.5%) followed by the second year (58.6%) of their study had a certain level of anxiety and these variables had a significant relationship (p<0.001). Furthermore, anxiety was more prevalent 135 (77.6%) among diploma students as compared to those students who were doing BSN degree 93 (51.4%) and this variable is also found statistically significant (p<0.001).

Table 2: Relationship between depression, anxiety, and stress among the participants.

Depression

Anxiety

Stress

Depression

1.0

Anxiety

0.784**

1.0

Stress

0.705**

0.678**

1.0

**: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

In examining the association between stress and baseline characteristics, study year (p=0.004), educational program (p=0.001), and residency of participants (p=0.012) were found in significant association with stress.

Table 2 disclosed the relationship between depression, anxiety, and stress among nursing students. The Pearson’s correlation between depression, anxiety, and stress scores of the participants revealed that there was a significant positive strong correlation between depression and stress (r=0.70, p<0.001), depression and anxiety (r=0.78, p<0.001), and between anxiety and stress (r=0.67, p<0.001).

DISCUSSION

Nursing students are the nurses of the future. Hence, their psychological health, as well as physical, is most important for the best nursing care. If students’ health is not up to mark, they cannot get a proper education. Consequently, their clinical skills will be substandard as compared to the normal ones. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to determine the frequency of depression, anxiety, stress, and its associated factors among nursing students.

In this study, the frequency of depression was 44.2%. The results are slightly higher 57.9% than the Chinese study [15] and an almost similar 38.2% depression was established in Nepal [16]. On the other hand, another Nepalis study [17] disclosed 22.27% depression and 21% depression reported in Malaysia [17] which is significantly lower than the current study.

The present study revealed anxiety at 64.2%. Likewise, the results are a little bit lower 51.6% than our study findings [15]. In contrast, research studies conducted in Nepal disclosed 46.9% and 28.25% anxiety which is much lower than our study [15, 16]. Likewise, a Malaysian study [17] disclosed 50% anxiety which is comparable to our research finding.

In the current study, stress is reported at 42.3% among nursing students. Similarly, the result findings are a bit greater stress 55.6% than our study [15]. In contrast, 24.1% and only 6.52% stress were described in research studies carried out in Nepal [16, 17]. Also, 12% stress was reported in Malaysia [18] which is also much lesser than this research finding

It may be due to an underdeveloped country, peaked COVID-19 season, social distance and final examination of the students. Secondly, a lack of knowledge about their mental health in a Pakistani research study [19]. As a result, students and their parents do not focus on psychological health. Yet this prevalence is lower than among other medical students in the Pakistani context [20]. nursing students reported

In the current study, the prevalence of depression was recorded as 44.20%. Amongst, 14.10%, 14.60% and 15.50% were mild, moderate and severe depression respectively. Moreover, older students were found more depressed as compared to younger ones. On the other hand, a literature review of 27 studies highlighted 34% depression among nursing students and a large percentage of depression mentioned among younger students [21]. This may happen because as kids grow, roles and responsibilities may also be increased. In addition, an older child should support the family in financial burden. In the present study, more depression 44.7% noticed among female participants. In contrast, a Jordanian research study revealed that males faced more depression as compared to females [22]. Might be one of the major causes of female depression is family issues and domestic work leads them to mental problems. In our research study, more depression 50% were recorded among those subjects who had a family history of psychiatric history and this variable also found a statistically significant p-value of 0.003 with depression. This finding is also supported by a research study conducted in Saudi Arabia which highlighted that a significant relationship was evident between positive family history of depression or any psychiatric disorder [23], as some psychiatric disorders are run in families. Additionally, due to involvement of one family member disturbs the entire family. In the present study, the year of study and depression varied, in the third year of the study 52.2% of depression was noticed and this variable was also found significant with depression with a p-value of 0.05. This finding is in line with a study conducted in Karachi Pakistan reported more depression in semester III as compared to semester-I and II [24]. The students reach near graduation they will think more and more about searching for a job in a renowned institute. If they do not succeed in their aim, which will lead them toward depression and other physical and mental problems.

We found a 64.20% prevalence of anxiety among nursing students, slightly higher than the study done in Osijek, Croatia [25] and shiraz, Iran [26]. In the current study, differences were observed between age groups, older (30 years old and above) students were reported low 56.5% anxiety as compared to younger (18 to 29 years old) but this variable not found statistically significant.

A similar type of finding was reported by a study conducted in Ontario, Canada [27]. More females were found anxious 66.9% than males and the gender variable was found to be statistically significant with an anxiety p-value of 0.039. Likewise, findings were reported in a study accomplished in Iran. In the present study, the age of the participants, academic failure, marital status, smoking habit, educational institute, residency and family history of psychiatric haven’t established statistical significance with anxiety scores. These findings are also supported by the same Iranian research [28].

In the current study, 42.30% of stress was noticed and female participants were suffering more from stress. It is very close to a study conducted in Malaysia [29]. In the current study, there was no statistical association found between stress and age, gender, marital status, smoking status and institute. Whereas, In a Brazilian [30] study a significant association has been found between stress and sex, age group, and marital status. In the present study, the increased trend of the stress of 32.2%, 35.7%, 50% and 58.8% were noticed as the year of study progressed from 1 to 4th year respectively. A similar type of trend has been recorded by a study done in Australia [31].

A meta-analysis was conducted to measure the effectiveness of different interventions such as yoga, mindfulness and meditation on anxiety, depression and stress. It found a significant reduction in depression, stress and anxiety among study participants as compared to the control group [32]. Hence, such types of intervention should be conducted in educational institutions periodically to reduce mental disorders. As the student will remain a psychological fit, he learns vast in theory class which ultimately makes better clinical practice. Consequently, leads to better patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded from the current study that the nursing students were facing a significant level of depression, anxiety and stress. The anxiety levels were higher in participants followed by depression and stress. It is also highlighted that the educational program, family history of psychiatric disorder, gender, year of study and residency of the participants are associated with anxiety, depression and stress. Moreover, there was a significant positive strong correlation between depression, anxiety and stress.

ETHICS APPROVAL

Ethical permission for data collection was granted by Federal Government Polyclinic Ref: No. FGPC. 1/12/2021/Ethical Committee. Confidentiality of data was assured. Participation of participants was voluntary. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the Helsinki declaration.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Written informed consent was taken from all of the participants who participated in this study.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA

The data set analyzed during the current study is not made public due to confidentiality. However, data may be shared at a reasonable request to the corresponding author.

FUNDING

No funding was secured for this paper

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTION

SHB designed the study, conception and data collection. R data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing B contributed to draft writing.

REFERENCES

1. Cheung T, Wong S, Wong K, Law L, Ng K, Tong M, et al. Depression, anxiety and symptoms of stress among baccalaureate nursing students in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016; 13(8): 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph43080779.

2. Ruz ME, Al-Akash HY, Jarrah S. Persistent (anxiety and depression) affected academic achievement and absenteeism in nursing students. Open Nurs J 2018; 12: 171-9. doi: 10.2174/1874434601812010171.

3. Rathnayake S, Ekanayaka J. Depression, anxiety, and stress among undergraduate nursing students in a public university in Sri Lanka. Int J Caring Sci 2016; 9(3): 1020-32.

4. Hope V, Henderson M. Medical student depression, anxiety and distress outside North America: a systematic review. Med Educ 2014; 48(10): 963-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12512.

5. Khesht-Masjedi MF, Shokrgozar S, Abdollahi E, Habibi B, Asghari T, Ofoghi RS, et al. The relationship between gender, age, anxiety, depression, and academic achievement among teenagers. J Family Med Prim Care 2019; 8: 799-804. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc. jfmpc_103_18.

6. Sachan N, Yadav N, Masih P, Spencer P, Gautam R, Rawat R, et al. Depression, anxiety and stress among nursing students. Asian J Nurs Educ Res 2022; 12(1): 70-4. DOI: 10.52711/2349- 2996.2022.00014.

7. Ghazwin MY, Kavian M, Ahmadloo M, Jarchi A, Javadi SG, Latifi S, et al. The association between life satisfaction and the extent of depression, anxiety and stress among Iranian nurses: a multicenter survey. Iran J Psychiatry 2016; 11(2): 120-7.

8. Aradilla-Herrero A, Tomás-Sábado J, Gómez-Benito J. Associations between emotional intelligence, depression and suicide risk in nursing students. Nurse Educ Today 2014; 34(4): 520-5. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.001.

9. Xu Y, Chi X, Chen S, Qi J, Zhang P, Yang Y. Prevalence and correlates of depression among college nursing students in China. Nurse Educ Today 2014; 34(6): e7- 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. nedt.2013.10.017.

10. Chen CJ, Chen YC, Sung HC, Hsieh TC, Lee MS, Chang CY. The prevalence and related factors of depressive symptoms among junior college nursing students: a cross-sectional study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2015; 22(8): 590-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jpm.12252.

11. UlHaq N, Riaz S, Naseem A, Tahir M, Ahmed N. Evaluation of mental health of students related to medical fields in Quetta,

Pakistan: a cross-sectional study. J Pak Psychiatr Soc 2017; 14(1): 28-31.

12. Osama M, Islam MY, Hussain SA, Masroor SM, Burney MU, Masood MA, et al. Suicidal ideation among medical students of Pakistan: a cross-sectional study. J Forensic Leg Med 2014; 1(27): 65-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.08.006.

13. Chatterjee S, Saha I, Mukhopadhyay S, Misra R, Chakraborty A, Bhattacharya A. Depression among nursing students in an Indian government college. Br J Nurs 2014; 23(6): 316-20. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.6.316.

14. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety & stress scales. 2nd Ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation 1995.

15. Zeng Y, Wang G, Xie C, Hu X, Reinhardt JD. Prevalence and correlates of depression, anxiety and symptoms of stress in vocational college nursing students from Sichuan, China: a cross- sectional study. Psychol Health Med 2019; 24(7): 798-811. DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2019.1574358.

16. Paudel S, Gautam H, Adhikari C, Yadav DK. Depression, anxiety and stress among the undergraduate students of Pokhara metropolitan. Nepal J Nepal Health Res Counc 2020; 18(1): 27- 34. DOI: 10.33314/jnhrc.v18i1.2189.

17. Deo PK, Budhathoki S, Raut J, Adhikari B, Shrestha J. Factors associated with perceived stress, anxiety, depression, insomnia during COVID-19 outbreak among nursing students. Int J Sci Res 2020; 17(19): 23-9. DOI: 10.21275/SR20826170002.

18. Hamzah NS, Farid ND, Yahya A, Chin C, Su TT, Rampal SR, et al. The prevalence and associated factors of depression, anxiety and stress of first year undergraduate students in a public higher learning institution in Malaysia. J Child Family Stud 2019; 28(12): 3545-57.

19. Farooq S, Lakhdir MP, Parpio YN, Haider SI, Rahim S, Nathwani AA, et al. The effect of a culturally sensitive mental well-being module on Pakistani nursing students’ knowledge and beliefs regarding their own mental health and illness. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2021; 30(5): 1193-209. DOI: 10.1111/inm.12870.

20. Azim SR, Baig M. Frequency and perceived causes of depression, anxiety and stress among medical students of a private medical institute in Karachi: a mixed method study. J Pak Med Assoc 2019; 69(6): 840-5.

21. Tung YJ, Lo KK, Ho RC, Tam WS. Prevalence of depression among nursing students: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Nurse Educ Today 2018; 63: 119-29. DOI.org/10.1016/j. nedt.2018.01.009.

22. Yousef S, Athamneh M, Masuadi E, Ahmad H, Loney T, Moselhy HF, et al. Association between depression and factors affecting career choice among Jordanian nursing students. Front Public Health 2017; 5: 311. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00311.

23. Dawood E, Mitsu R, Ghadeer H, Alrabodh F. Assessment of depression and its contributing factors among undergraduate nursing students. Int J Nurs 2017; 4(2): 69-79. https://doi.org/ DOI:10.15640/ijn.v4n2a6.

24. Khan AU, Ali S. Prevalence of depression and its associated factors among nursing students in Karachi, Pakistan. Pak J Public Health 2019; 9(1): 34-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32413/pjph.v9i1.310.

25. Milić J, Škrlec I, Milić Vranješ I, Podgornjak M, Heffer M. High levels of depression and anxiety among Croatian medical and nursing students and the correlation between subjective happiness and personality traits. Int Rev Psychiatry 2019; 31(7-8): 653-60. DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2019.1594647.

26. Mojarrab S, Bazrafkan L, Jaberi A. The effect of a stress and anxiety coping program on objective structured clinical examination performance among nursing students in Shiraz, Iran. BMC Med Educ 2020; 20(1): 1-7. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02228-9.

27. Wang AH, Lee CT, Espin S. Undergraduate nursing students’ experiences of anxiety-producing situations in clinical practicums: a descriptive survey study. Nurse Educ Today 2019; 76: 103-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.01.016.

28. Shamsaei F, Yaghmaei S, Sadeghian E, Tapak L. Survey of stress, anxiety and depression in Undergraduate Nursing Students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Psychiatr Nurs 2018; 6(3): 26-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.21859/ijpn-06034.

29. Jia YF, Loo YT. Prevalence and determinants of perceived stress among undergraduate students in a Malaysian University. J Health Transl Med 2018; 21(1): 1-5.

30. Cestari VR, Barbosa IV, Florêncio RS, Pessoa VL, Moreira TM. Stress in nursing students: study on sociodemographic and academic vulnerabilities. Acta Paul Enferm 2017; 30: 190-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201700029.

31. Pitt A, Oprescu F, Tapia G, Gray M. An exploratory study of students’ weekly stress levels and sources of stress during the semester. Act Learn High Educ 2018; 19(1): 61-75. https://doi. org/10.1177/1469787417731194.

32. Breedvelt JJ, Amanvermez Y, Harrer M, Karyotaki E, Gilbody S, Bockting CL, et al. The effects of meditation, yoga, and mindfulness on depression, anxiety, and stress in tertiary education students: a meta-analysis. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10: 193. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyt.2019.00193.

@*

Abstract

Background: Rheumatic heart disease is one of the most frequent types of acquired heart disease, and it is one of the leading causes of morbidity and death. Awareness of doctors regarding rheumatic fever and how to prevent it is important for primary and secondary prevention.

Objective: The study aimed to assess the knowledge of rheumatic fever and its prevention and the association of knowledge with cardiology working experience among local doctors working at a tertiary cardiac care unit.

Methodology: It was a cross-sectional study conducted at the department of cardiology of a national institute of cardiovascular disease and its satellite centers, Karachi, Pakistan from December, 2020 to June 2021. Doctors of age more than 25 years of either gender were included in the study. A self-administered questionnaire, circulated through emails was used to collect data on age, gender, designation, total years of experience, and years of experience in the cardiac unit and 10 questions to assess the knowledge regarding rheumatic fever and its prevention. Based on the correct response, the doctors were categorized as either having adequate knowledge or inadequate knowledge regarding various aspects of rheumatic fever. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS version 21.

Results: A total of 225 participants were approached, out of which 200 responded and completed the survey with response rate of 88.9%. The mean age of the doctors was 37.40±6.55 years. Most of the participants were males (87.5%). About 82% of the doctors had adequate knowledge about the mechanism of rheumatic fever. A large proportion of participants answered correctly about prophylaxis post-surgery (58%). Doctors with more than 2 years of experience in the cardiology department had better knowledge about the mechanism (p=0.017), diagnosis (p=0.005), post-surgery prophylaxis (p=0.005), duration of secondary prophylactic treatment (p=0.03), drug of choice for secondary prophylaxis (p=0.026) as compared to doctors with up to 2 years of experience in the cardiology department.

Conclusion: Knowledge regarding the duration of secondary prophylaxis and primary prophylaxis was low among doctors. Years of working experience in the cardiology unit was a significant factor in the knowledge of the mechanism, diagnosis and recurrence of reheumatic fever and it is also associated with duration and drugs of secondary prophylaxis.

Keywords: Awareness, post-exposure prophylaxis, rheumatic fever, rheumatic heart disease prevention.

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatic fever (RF) is a type of autoimmune disease caused by infection with Group-A hemolytic streptococci (GAS) [1]. RF has an impact on a variety of organs, including the skin, joints, bone, and heart [2]. Long- term damage is only identified in the cardiac valves, which can lead to stenosis or regurgitation, resulting in hemodynamic instability. This cardiac condition is known as Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) [2, 3].

RHD is one of the most frequent types of acquired heart disease, and it is one of the leading causes of morbidity and death [3, 4]. The global disease burden of RF in 2005 was estimated to be 471,000 cases, with RHD prevalence ranging from 15.6 million to 19.6 million cases [3, 4]. Every year, RHD claims the lives of 288,348 people in poor and middle-income nations [5]. In Pakistan, the prevalence of RHD has been estimated at 88 million cases, with 500,000 people from rural Pakistan [6]. The optimal management of RHD is a combination of primary group A streptococcal infection treatment, treatment of ongoing underlying inflammation to prevent the development of primary RF, and secondary prophylaxis to prevent subsequent attacks and treatment of residual heart disease if someone develops RF [7, 8]. A single incident of RF does not cause valvular damage, but recurrent episodes can result in valvular damage [3, 7]. With each episode of RF, the valvular damage worsens which leads to heart failure and arrhythmias, necessitating valvular intervention [9].

A study conducted at Khartoum shows awareness of doctors regarding RF and how to prevent it is average when it comes to primary and secondary prevention [10]. Inadequate treatment and subsequent prophylaxis of RF and RHD are caused by a lack of awareness among doctors [10, 11]. Physicians, on the other hand, are thought to be crucial in improving adherence and preventing disease development. Additionally, there is no literature available for Pakistani doctors in this regard. Therefore, we assessed the awareness of pathogenesis, signs, symptoms, pertinent laboratory work-up treatment, and secondary prophylaxis of RF and also the effect of cardiology working experience on knowledge among physicians working in a tertiary cardiac care center in Karachi, Pakistan. This research could aid in the designing of seminars and lectures to improve RF knowledge and promote secondary prophylaxis.

METHODOLOGY

It was a cross-sectional study conducted at the department of cardiology of a national institute of cardiovascular disease and its satellite centers, Karachi, Pakistan from Dec 2020 to Jun 2021. The sample size of 196 was estimated using an online Open Epi sample size calculator by taking frequency of awareness of physicians regarding prevention of RF and RHD as 50% [10], absolute precision as 7% and 95% confidence level. Doctors of various cadres (Assistant professors, post fellows, postgraduate trainees, medical officers and house officers) of age more than 25 years of either gender were included in the study. Doctors who had less than one month of medical training were excluded from the study. Non-probability convenience sampling technique was applied for sample selection.

The study was started after taking approval from the ethical review committee of the hospital (ERC-65/2020). Participants were asked to fill out a consent form online while maintaining confidentiality. The name of the participants was kept confidential. A self-administered and online questionnaire was used to collect data on age, gender, designation, total years of experience, and years of experience in the cardiac unit. The second part of the questionnaire had 8 questions to assess the knowledge regarding RF. Question 1 included 4 sub-questions regarding the mechanism of GAS throat infection. Question 2 included 5 sub-questions regarding clinical/laboratory findings of GAS throat infection. Q3 and 4 both were merged to measure knowledge level for primary prophylaxis. Question 3a included 5 questions regarding treatment (primary prophylaxis) of GAS throat infection. Question 3b was about the prescription drug for GAS throat infection in a patient allergic to penicillin. Question 4 included 5 sub-questions regarding the recurrence of RF. Question 5 included 3 sub-questions regarding secondary prophylaxis like its duration. Question 6 was regarding the frequency of secondary prophylaxis. Question 7 was regarding the site of administration of benzathine penicillin G injection. Question 8 was regarding the drugs for secondary prophylaxis. Every sub-question had responses as true or false/yes or no. Like Answering all the sub-questions correctly was considered as adequate knowledge for that component/question. The questionnaire was designed

by the authors themselves after an extensive literature review [9-14]. The questionnaire was developed on Google docs and distributed through emails. The list of emails was obtained from hospital administration and reminder emails were sent every 7th day for 1 month.

Data was entered and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science version 21 (SPSS v.21). The distribution of quantitative data was assessed using Shapiro-Wilk’s test. The quantitative data such as age was normally distributed, therefore, presented as mean ± standard deviation. While the quantitative data such as years of experience in the cardiology department was non-normal therefore, presented as the median with interquartile range (IQR). Frequency and percentages were reported for categorical variables like gender, designation and knowledge items regarding RF and its prevention. Chi-square/Fisher exact test was applied to assess the association between cardiology working experience and knowledge regarding RF and its prevention. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

After inflating the sample size by 15% for non- respondents, a total of 225 participants were approached, out of which 200 responded and completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 88.9%. The mean age of the 200 doctors was 37.40+6.55 years. Males made up the majority of the participants (n=175, 87.5%). Among the 200 doctors, 137(68.5%) were postgraduate trainees,

28(14%) were consultants, 16(8%) were assistant professors, and 19(9.5%) were junior doctors [i.e. 15(7.5%) medical officers and 4(2%) house officers].

Doctors had a median of 5 years of overall work experience (IQR: 4 to 7 years). Out of 200 doctors, more than half of the doctors had up to five years of overall work experience (52%). The median work experience of doctors in the cardiac department was two years (IQR: 1 to 4 years). Out of the total doctors, 97(48.5%) of the

Fig. (1): Frequency distribution of adequate knowledge regarding rheumatic fever and secondary prophylaxis.

Table 1: Stratification of knowledge regarding rheumatic fever and secondary prophylaxis with respect to doctors’ cardiology experience.

Question No.

Knowledge Items

Cardiology Experience

p-value

Up to 2 Years n(%)

More than 2 Years n(%)

Knowledge about Rheumatic Fever

1

Mechanism of RF

78 (47.6)

86 (52.4)

0.017

2

Diagnosis of RF

41 (41.4)

58 (58.6)

0.005

3

Primary prophylaxis

30 (62.5)

18 (37.5)

0.080

4

Recurrence of RF

52 (44.8)

64 (55.2)

0.027

Knowledge about Secondary Prophylaxis

5

Secondary prophylaxis (duration)

29 (65.9)

15 (34.1)

0.030

6

Frequency of secondary prophylaxis

43 (49.4)

44 (50.6)

0.606

7

Site of administration of benazathine penicillin G injection

47 (46.5)

54 (53.5)

0.156

8

Drugs for secondary prophylaxis

34 (42)

47 (58)

0.026

participants had more than 2 years of working cardiology experience and 96(48%) had more than 5 years of experience in the cardiology department. A descriptive analysis of knowledge regarding RF and its prevention is displayed in Fig. (1).

Doctors with more than 2 years of work experience in cardiology departments had significantly higher knowledge of RH mechanism (p=0.017), diagnosis (p=0.005), and post-surgery prophylaxis (p=0.027) than doctors with less than 2 years of work experience in cardiology departments. Furthermore, doctors with more than 2 years of work experience in the cardiology department had substantially higher knowledge of secondary prophylaxis medications (p=0.026) than doctors with less than 2 years of work experience in the cardiology department (Table 1).

DISCUSSION

RF can occur following a sore throat. It is considered a disease in underprivileged countries, owing to low sanitation, immunity, and other health-related factors [5, 15, 16]. Although the number of individuals with RF and associated problems has reduced in recent years, South Asian countries still have a higher proportion of RF patients than other regions of the world [17, 18]. This problem could be caused by a lack of awareness among doctors and caregivers concerning GAS pharyngitis, RF, and their long-term consequences [10, 13, 14]. Hence, in this study, we assessed the knowledge of Pakistani doctors working at a tertiary care cardiac hospital and its satellite facilities on RF and how to prevent RF.

Although a vast majority of doctors were aware of the mechanism (82%) and 58% of the doctors knew about the recurrence of RF. Furthermore, 49.5% knew about the diagnosis of RF i.e. clinical/laboratory findings of GAS throat infection in RF patients. Osman et al. [10] also revealed that the knowledge of doctors regarding RF was average even after a teaching session, thus, needed more effective intervention for improvement. Osman et al. [10] also reported a low awareness regarding the diagnosis GAS pharyngitis in their study (38%). The variation in findings might be due to variation in exposure to RHD cases in both countries. While

another study by Danbauchi et al. [19] found that 76% of the physicians made the right diagnosis of RHD. These findings are important because primary RF treatment after a GAS pharyngitis episode is critical for reducing the occurrence of RF [17, 20]. As a result, doctors and caregivers must be made more aware of the risks and symptoms of both the preceding streptococcal pharyngitis and RF.

Secondary prophylaxis for RF is proven to be very efficient and cost-effective [20, 21]. In this study, the proportion of doctors with adequate knowledge about the duration of secondary prophylaxis was found to be very low (22%). About 50.5% had correct knowledge regarding the site of administration of the injection. However, there was a general lack of awareness about the drug to be used and the frequency of doses, for which only 40.5% and 43.5% answered correctly. Another study done by Osman GM showed roughly similar results [10]. In the study by Techane et al. found that 74.5% of health workers knew about the drug of choice for secondary prophylaxis and 84.7% responded that Benzathine penicillin is the drug of choice for the treatment of sore throat to prevent acute RF [22]. Hence, there is an urgent need to raise awareness through regular lectures and better teaching protocols as secondary prevention plays an important role in overall mortality and morbidity associated with RF.

In the current study, doctors with more than 2 years of experience in a cardiology unit had considerably higher knowledge of the mechanism, clinical findings and recurrence of RF, and drugs for secondary prophylaxis, but knowledge of secondary prophylaxis duration was significantly lower in those who had >2 years’ experience than those having up to 2 years experiences (34.1% versus 65.9%). This necessitates additional efforts to raise the understanding of these fundamental concepts of RF among junior doctors. However, time spent in the cardiology department was not associated with knowledge of primary RF prophylaxis, frequency of secondary prophylaxis and site of administration of benzathine penicillin G injection. Doctors with shorter experience had lesser awareness this may be because protocols for RF primary and secondary prophylaxis are

not deeply stressed during the undergraduate years. And most of the understanding is developed through on- job training and education.

Our study had a few drawbacks, the first of which was that it only included doctors from a single center. Second, the vast majority of the participants were postgraduate trainees, implying that they would have a higher education than the ordinary general practitioner in our country. Finally, all of the doctors worked in a cardiac care unit, which has a higher rate of RF and RHD, resulting in enhanced exposure and knowledge of the disease among the study participants. Due to the limitations of the study, results cannot be generalized. More research, with a broader and more diverse group of doctors, is needed to gain a better grip on the subject.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge regarding the duration of secondary prophylaxis and primary prophylaxis was low among doctors. Years of working experience in the cardiology unit was a significant factor in the knowledge of the mechanism, diagnosis and recurrence of RF and it is also associated with duration, and drugs of secondary prophylaxis.

ETHICS APPROVAL

The study was started after taking approval from the ethical review committee of the hospital (ERC- 65/2020). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the Helsinki declaration.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Written informed consent was obtained from all the eligible participants.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA

Data is available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank all the doctors at our hospital and satellite centers for participating in the study.

AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTION

SA, JAS, GAS, TS and SK: Conception or design of the work, Final approval of the version to be published, agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. SAB, SK, NR, RA: Drafting

the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published. KA: The acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work, Final approval of the version to be published.

REFERENCES

1. Zühlke LJ, Beaton A, Engel ME, Hugo-Hamman CT, Karthikeyan G, Katzenellenbogen JM, et al. Group A Streptococcus, Acute Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease: Epidemiology and Clinical Considerations. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017;19(2):15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-017-0513-y.

2. Guo Q, Wang Y, Xu D, Nossent J, Pavlos NJ, Xu J. Rheumatoid arthritis: pathological mechanisms and modern pharmacologic therapies. Bone Res. 2018;6:15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41413-018-0016-9.

3. Sika-Paotonu D, Beaton A, Raghu A, Steer A, Carapetis J, Ferretti JJ, et al. Acute Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease. 2017 Mar 10 [Updated 2017 Apr 3]. In: Ferretti JJ, Stevens DL, Fischetti VA, editors. Streptococcus pyogenes: Basic Biology to Clinical Manifestations Oklahoma City (OK): University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; 2016. Available from: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425394/.

4. Carapetis JR, Beaton A, Cunningham MW, Guilherme L, Karthikeyan G, Mayosi BM, et al. Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Jan 14;2:15084. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.84.

5. WHO. Rheumatic Heart Disease: World Health Organization; 2021 [cited 2021 19 September]. Available from: https://www.who.int/ news-room/fact-sheets/detail/rheumatic-heart-disease.

6. Rizvi SF, Khan MA, Kundi A, Marsh DR, Samad A, Pasha O. Status of rheumatic heart disease in rural Pakistan. Heart. 2004;90(4):394-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2003.025981.

7. Barik R. Secondary prophylaxis to control rheumatic heart disease in developing countries: Put into a cage if can’t be killed. Indian Heart J. 2018;70(6):907-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ihj.2018.01.001

8. Watkins DA, Beaton AZ, Carapetis JR, Karthikeyan G, Mayosi BM, Wyber R, et al. Rheumatic Heart Disease Worldwide: JACC Scientific Expert Panel. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(12):1397-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.063

9. Chamberlain-Salaun J, Mills J, Kevat PM, Rémond MGW, Maguire GP. Sharing success – understanding barriers and enablers to secondary prophylaxis delivery for rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16(1):166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.063

10. Osman GM, Abdelrahman SM, Ali SK. Evaluation of physicians’ knowledge about prevention of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease before and after a teaching session. Sudan J Paediatr. 2015;15(2):37-42.

11. Mekonen KK, Yismaw MB, Abiye AA, Tadesse TA. Adherence to Benzathine Penicillin G Secondary Prophylaxis and Its Determinants in Patients with Rheumatic Heart Disease at a Cardiac Center of an Ethiopian Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020;14:343-352. DOI: https://doi. org/10.2147/PPA.S238423

12. Maria MR. Awareness of rheumatic heart disease prevention among primary health care providers and people aged nine years and above in Kinondoni municipality Dar es salaam, Tanzania: Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences; 2011.

13. Mougrabi MM, Aljuaid RS, Alrabie AD, Althumali NK, Alkhaldi LH, Alotaibi WD. Awareness of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease among the population in taif, Saudi Arabia 2020. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10(8): 3056-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ jfmpc.jfmpc_2550_20

14. Zühlke LJ, Engel ME. The Importance of Awareness and Education in Prevention and Control of RHD. Glob Heart 2013;8(3):235-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gheart.2013.08.009

15. Baker MG, Gurney J, Oliver J, Moreland NJ, Williamson DA, Pierse N, et al. Risk Factors for Acute Rheumatic Fever: Literature Review and Protocol for a Case-Control Study in New Zealand. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 201916(22):4515. DOI: https://doi. org/10.3390/ijerph46224515

16. Almadhi AA, Alshammri MR, Altamimi NO, Hadal SA, Al Madhi AA, Salahie MS. Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease- Related Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice in Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2021;13(11):e19997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19997.

17. Kumar RK, Tandon R. Rheumatic fever & rheumatic heart disease: the last 50 years. Indian J Med Res. 2013;137(4):643-58.

18. Islam AKMM, Majumder AAS. Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Bangladesh: A review. Indian Heart J. 2016;68(1): 88-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2015.07.039.

19. Danbauchi S, Alhassan M, David S, Wammanda R, Oyati I. Spectrum of rheumatic heart disease in Zaria, Northern Nigeria. Ann Afr Med 2004;3(1):17-21.

20. Robertson KA, Volmink JA, Mayosi BM. Antibiotics for the primary prevention of acute rheumatic fever: a meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005;5(1):11. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1186/1471-2261-5-11

21. Hajar R. Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease a Historical Perspective. Heart Views. 2016;17(3):120-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-705X.192572

22. Techane T, Legesse B, Ayalew Y, Hailu A. Rheumatic heart disease knowledge and associated factors among nurses working in cardiac centers at public and private hospitals of Addis Ababa: cross sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1):130. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1186/s12912-022-00910-5