Editorial


Molecular Profiling in Colon Cancer: Integrating Research with Clinical Practice

Authors: Jamshed Ali
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37184/lnjcc.2789-0112.7.27
Year: 2026
Volume: 8
Received: Jun 11, 2026
Revised: Jul 08, 2026
Accepted: Jul 09, 2026
Corresponding Auhtor: Jamshed Ali (jamshed.ali09@gmail.com)
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License



ABSTRACT

Colon cancer ranks third among malignancies worldwide and second among causes of cancer-related death [1]. In developing countries like Pakistan, infrastructure and therapeutic options remain limited, and the majority of our patients present with advanced metastatic disease. Moreover, the median age at presentation in our part of the world is under 47 years, roughly a decade earlier than that of the typical Western cohort [2]. It is now clinically necessary to comprehend the biology of this illness in our community.

Colon cancer acts like a collection of distinct diseases, each with a unique clinical trajectory and susceptibility to treatment. Microsatellite instability testing now identifies the patients who benefit from immune checkpoint inhibition [3]. While Rat Sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RAS) and B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) profiling guide targeted therapies and flag tumors likely to behave aggressively. Circulating tumor DNA adds a further layer, providing a real-time readout of disease progression and is most helpful in identifying minute residual disease following resection [4]. These markers increasingly inform multidisciplinary tumor board discussions, allowing treatment to be personalized rather than allocated solely on the basis of histopathology or tumor stage.

However, Western populations, whose tumor biology may differ from our own, continue to provide the vast majority of the therapeutic procedures used here. In Pakistani cancer-hospital series, around 72% of colorectal cancer patients had left-sided tumors, a distribution that deserves study on its own terms rather than being assumed to mirror Western data [5, 6]. Developing local, evidence-based guidelines is essential to providing our patients with the personalized treatment they deserve; it is a clinical necessity, not a luxury.

This space is what the accompanying paper begins to address. Different autosomal signatures across metabolic and growth-signaling pathways are described in the paper on age- and sex-stratified transcriptomic profiling of colon adenocarcinoma. This suggests that an older man and a young woman with histologically identical tumors may have very different underlying biology. These results support considering age, gender, and molecular subtype in addition to histology and stage when choosing a course of treatment.

Building local molecular registries, confirming these markers in our community, and setting up profiling systems that our hospitals can realistically sustain are among the practical difficulties that lie ahead. Every local study contributes to a thin body of information, and public-private collaborations and cost-effective testing techniques will likely be required to make profiling practical in resource-constrained settings. Artificial intelligence is also evolving as a tool to support this type of precision oncology by helping integrate genetic, pathological, radiological, and clinical data.

We hope this work will stimulate more regionally based research grounded in the molecular features of our own patients. It is a welcome contribution to those endeavors.

Corresponding author: Jamshed Ali, Department of Medical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Peshawar, Pakistan, Email: jamshed.ali09@gmail.com

Received: June 11, 2026; Revised: July 08, 2026; Accepted: July 09, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37184/lnjcc.2789-0112.7.27

REFERENCES

1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74(3): 229-63.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834

2. Deo SVS, Kumar S, Bhoriwal S, Shukla NK, Sharma A, Thulkar S, et al. Colorectal cancers in low- and middle-income countries—demographic pattern and clinical profile of 970 patients treated at a tertiary care cancer center in India. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 7: 1110-15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/go.21.00111

3. André T, Lonardi S, Zaanan A, Cohen R, Taieb J. Checkpoint inhibitors in microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer: treatment strategies, specificities, and care management questions. ESMO Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 12: 100341.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmogo.2026.100341

4. Bartolomucci A, Nobrega M, Ferrier T, Dickinson K, Kaorey N, Nadeau A, et al. Circulating tumor DNA to monitor treatment response in solid tumors and advance precision oncology. NPJ Precis Oncol 2025; 9(1): 84.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-025-00876-y

5. Anwar N, Badar F, Yusuf MA. Profile of patients with colorectal cancer at a tertiary care cancer hospital in Pakistan. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1138: 199-203.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1414.026

6. Osama M, Moosa H, Rangwala HS, Rangwala BS, Farrukh A, Fayaz S, et al. Cancer Control 2025; 32: 10732748251351423.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748251351423